Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18141
**[Test build #77521 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77521/testReport)**
for PR 18141 at commit
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18141
@maropu Sure. Thanks.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user zsxwing commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18107#discussion_r118608662
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/internal/SQLConf.scala ---
@@ -828,6 +837,8 @@ class SQLConf extends Serializable with Logging {
Github user zsxwing commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18107#discussion_r119014976
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/streaming/statefulOperators.scala
---
@@ -273,27 +333,34 @@ case class
Github user zsxwing commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18107#discussion_r119016141
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/streaming/statefulOperators.scala
---
@@ -165,54 +189,88 @@ case class
Github user zsxwing commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18107#discussion_r118802674
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/internal/SQLConf.scala ---
@@ -552,6 +552,15 @@ object SQLConf {
.booleanConf
Github user zsxwing commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18107#discussion_r119014965
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/streaming/statefulOperators.scala
---
@@ -253,6 +311,8 @@ case class StateStoreSaveExec(
Github user zsxwing commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18107#discussion_r119014982
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/streaming/statefulOperators.scala
---
@@ -304,8 +371,9 @@ case class
Github user zsxwing commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18107#discussion_r118804254
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/streaming/StreamSuite.scala ---
@@ -719,3 +745,23 @@ object ThrowingInterruptedIOException {
Github user zsxwing commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18107#discussion_r119014511
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/streaming/state/StateStore.scala
---
@@ -47,50 +44,54 @@ trait StateStore {
/**
Github user zsxwing commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18107#discussion_r118615627
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/streaming/statefulOperators.scala
---
@@ -61,11 +60,24 @@ trait StateStoreReader extends
Github user zsxwing commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18107#discussion_r119014924
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/streaming/statefulOperators.scala
---
@@ -165,54 +189,88 @@ case class
Github user zsxwing commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18107#discussion_r119014948
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/streaming/statefulOperators.scala
---
@@ -165,54 +189,88 @@ case class
Github user zsxwing commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18107#discussion_r119013976
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/streaming/state/StateStore.scala
---
@@ -102,28 +103,100 @@ trait StateStore {
}
Github user zsxwing commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18107#discussion_r119014486
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/streaming/state/StateStore.scala
---
@@ -47,50 +44,54 @@ trait StateStore {
/**
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18142
**[Test build #77520 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77520/testReport)**
for PR 18142 at commit
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18142#discussion_r119014081
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/FunctionRegistry.scala
---
@@ -17,51 +17,74 @@
package
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18142#discussion_r119013261
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/catalog/SessionCatalog.scala
---
@@ -1205,8 +1204,8 @@ class SessionCatalog(
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18142#discussion_r119013093
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/catalog/SessionCatalog.scala
---
@@ -1116,8 +1115,8 @@ class SessionCatalog(
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18142
**[Test build #77519 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77519/testReport)**
for PR 18142 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18134
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77515/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18134
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18142#discussion_r119012967
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/FunctionRegistry.scala
---
@@ -72,39 +89,53 @@ trait FunctionRegistry {
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18134
**[Test build #77515 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77515/testReport)**
for PR 18134 at commit
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18142#discussion_r119012802
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/FunctionRegistry.scala
---
@@ -72,39 +89,53 @@ trait FunctionRegistry {
Github user maropu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18141
Better to add tests in `SQLQueryTestSuite`?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
GitHub user gatorsmile opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18142
[SPARK-20918] [SQL] Use FunctionIdentifier as function identifiers in
FunctionRegistry
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Currently, the unquoted string of a function
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18134
Build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18134
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77513/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18134
**[Test build #77513 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77513/testReport)**
for PR 18134 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18138
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77512/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18138
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18138
**[Test build #77512 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77512/testReport)**
for PR 18138 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14158
**[Test build #77518 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77518/testReport)**
for PR 14158 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14158
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77518/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14158
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14158
**[Test build #77518 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77518/testReport)**
for PR 14158 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18134
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18134
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77514/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18134
**[Test build #77514 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77514/testReport)**
for PR 18134 at commit
Github user lins05 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17750#discussion_r119009317
--- Diff: docs/running-on-mesos.md ---
@@ -516,6 +516,16 @@ See the [configuration page](configuration.html) for
information on Spark config
Github user actuaryzhang commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18140
@felixcheung Please take a look. Thanks.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18141
**[Test build #77517 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77517/testReport)**
for PR 18141 at commit
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18141
cc @JoshRosen @cloud-fan @hvanhovell @gatorsmile
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
GitHub user viirya opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18141
[SPARK-20916][SQL] Improve error message for unaliased subqueries in FROM
clause
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
We changed the parser to reject unaliased subqueries in
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14158
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14158
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77510/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14158
**[Test build #77510 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77510/testReport)**
for PR 14158 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18140
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18140
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77516/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14158#discussion_r119008402
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/parser/ParseDriver.scala
---
@@ -65,13 +65,29 @@ abstract class AbstractSqlParser
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18140
**[Test build #77516 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77516/testReport)**
for PR 18140 at commit
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14158#discussion_r119007096
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/plans/logical/LogicalPlan.scala
---
@@ -258,6 +258,9 @@ abstract class LogicalPlan
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18140
**[Test build #77516 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77516/testReport)**
for PR 18140 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18134
**[Test build #77515 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77515/testReport)**
for PR 18134 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18140
**[Test build #77511 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77511/testReport)**
for PR 18140 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18140
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77511/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18140
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18134
LGTM except for one comment about the function description.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18134#discussion_r119002317
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/datetimeExpressions.scala
---
@@ -404,6 +404,44 @@ case class
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18122
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18134
**[Test build #77514 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77514/testReport)**
for PR 18134 at commit
Github user actuaryzhang commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18122
@yanboliang I have moved the tests to the test file. Please let me know if
there is anything else needed. Thanks.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have
Github user pralabhkumar commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18118
16ccbdf is successful . Please review the pull request .
@MLnick @sethah @mpjlu @srowen
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
Github user wangyum commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18134#discussion_r119000601
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/datetimeExpressions.scala
---
@@ -402,6 +402,44 @@ case class
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18134
**[Test build #77513 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77513/testReport)**
for PR 18134 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18138
**[Test build #77512 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77512/testReport)**
for PR 18138 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18140
**[Test build #77511 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77511/testReport)**
for PR 18140 at commit
GitHub user actuaryzhang opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18140
Spark r formula
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Add `stringIndexerOrderType` to `spark.glm` and `spark.survreg` to support
string encoding that is consistent with
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18122
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18122
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77509/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18122
**[Test build #77509 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77509/testReport)**
for PR 18122 at commit
Github user nblintao commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14158#discussion_r11899
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/parser/ParseDriver.scala
---
@@ -50,13 +50,29 @@ abstract class AbstractSqlParser
Github user nblintao commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14158#discussion_r118998724
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ui/UIUtils.scala ---
@@ -326,7 +336,16 @@ private[spark] object UIUtils extends Logging {
val
Github user nblintao commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14158
I have just rebased. @ajbozarth @HyukjinKwon @gatorsmile @srowen @vanzin
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14158
**[Test build #77510 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77510/testReport)**
for PR 14158 at commit
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17308
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17935
@JoshRosen Thanks for filing this issue. I'll look into it.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18122
**[Test build #77509 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77509/testReport)**
for PR 18122 at commit
Github user zsxwing commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17308
LGTM. Merging to master and 2.2. Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user JoshRosen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17935
I was trying to run a test case from another database which _does_ support
unaliased subqueries in the `FROM` clause and hit a confusing parser error due
to this patch's behavior change. While I
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18132
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18132
Thanks - merging in master/branch-2.2.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13706#discussion_r118989451
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/catalog/SessionCatalog.scala
---
@@ -1090,6 +1090,24 @@ class SessionCatalog(
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13706#discussion_r118989143
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/catalog/SessionCatalog.scala
---
@@ -1090,6 +1090,24 @@ class SessionCatalog(
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13706#discussion_r118987906
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/NoSuchItemException.scala
---
@@ -52,3 +52,6 @@ class
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17880
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77507/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17880
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17880
**[Test build #77507 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77507/testReport)**
for PR 17880 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18122
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18122
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77508/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18122
**[Test build #77508 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77508/testReport)**
for PR 18122 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18122
**[Test build #77508 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77508/testReport)**
for PR 18122 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18139
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
GitHub user rberenguel opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18139
Spark 20787 invalid years
`time.mktime` can't handle dates from 1899-100, according to the
documentation by design. `calendar.timegm` is equivalent in shared cases, but
can handle those years.
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18135
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user zsxwing commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18135
LGTM. Merging to master and 2.2. Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18138
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77505/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18138
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18138
**[Test build #77505 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77505/testReport)**
for PR 18138 at commit
1 - 100 of 183 matches
Mail list logo
