GitHub user lianhuiwang opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18193
[SPARK-15616] [SQL] Metastore relation should fallback to HDFS size of
partitions that are involved in Query for JoinSelection.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Currently
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18159
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user lianhuiwang commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13373
@HyukjinKwon @cloud-fan I will close this PR and create new PR #18193 for
it. Thanks.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as w
Github user lianhuiwang closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13373
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature i
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18159
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77710/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18159
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77708/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18159
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77709/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18159
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18159
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18159
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77707/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18159
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18193
**[Test build #77711 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77711/testReport)**
for PR 18193 at commit
[`5591a1c`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/55
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18159
**[Test build #77712 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77712/testReport)**
for PR 18159 at commit
[`32f49ea`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/32
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18186
**[Test build #3776 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/3776/testReport)**
for PR 18186 at commit
[`4c3dbeb`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/4
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18186
**[Test build #3776 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/3776/testReport)**
for PR 18186 at commit
[`4c3dbeb`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18193
**[Test build #77711 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77711/testReport)**
for PR 18193 at commit
[`5591a1c`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/5
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18193
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18193
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77711/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18159
**[Test build #77713 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77713/testReport)**
for PR 18159 at commit
[`3137566`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/31
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18159
**[Test build #77712 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77712/testReport)**
for PR 18159 at commit
[`32f49ea`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/3
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18159
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18159
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77712/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18159
@cloud-fan @rxin I've removed about 200+ lines from this. Please take a
look if you have time. Thanks.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18159
**[Test build #77714 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77714/testReport)**
for PR 18159 at commit
[`e8acb49`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/e8
Github user liu-zhaokun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18108
@srowen
Could you help me review this PR?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this f
GitHub user kiszk opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18194
[WIP][SPARK-20824][SQL] Generate code to get value from table cache with
wider column in ColumnarBatch
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR waits for merging #18066
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18194
**[Test build #77715 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77715/testReport)**
for PR 18194 at commit
[`0c22730`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/0c
Github user zhengcanbin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18192
Tks @HyukjinKwon
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so,
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18194
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18194
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77715/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18194
**[Test build #77715 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77715/testReport)**
for PR 18194 at commit
[`0c22730`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/0
Github user kiszk commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18194
Jenkins, retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishe
Github user kiszk closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13171
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enab
Github user kiszk commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13171
@HyukjinKwon Thank you for your gentle ping.
While there is no follow-up PR for this, this is out-of-date. Let me close
this for now.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18194
**[Test build #77716 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77716/testReport)**
for PR 18194 at commit
[`0c22730`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/0c
Github user michalsenkyr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16986#discussion_r120009967
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/objects/objects.scala
---
@@ -652,6 +653,299 @@ case class MapObjects
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18194
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77716/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18194
**[Test build #77716 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77716/testReport)**
for PR 18194 at commit
[`0c22730`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/0
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18194
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user michalsenkyr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16986#discussion_r120010289
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/objects/objects.scala
---
@@ -652,6 +653,299 @@ case class MapObjects
Github user michalsenkyr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16986#discussion_r120010461
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/objects/objects.scala
---
@@ -652,6 +653,299 @@ case class MapObjects
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18159
**[Test build #77713 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77713/testReport)**
for PR 18159 at commit
[`3137566`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/3
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18159
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user michalsenkyr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16986#discussion_r120010531
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/objects/objects.scala
---
@@ -652,6 +653,299 @@ case class MapObjects
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18159
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77713/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18159
**[Test build #77717 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77717/testReport)**
for PR 18159 at commit
[`de069e7`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/de
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18159
**[Test build #77714 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77714/testReport)**
for PR 18159 at commit
[`e8acb49`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18159
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18159
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77714/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18159
**[Test build #77718 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77718/testReport)**
for PR 18159 at commit
[`82de2a3`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/82
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18159
**[Test build #77719 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77719/testReport)**
for PR 18159 at commit
[`ba1070b`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/ba
GitHub user wangyum opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18195
[SPARK-20921][SQL][WIP] Support can config OracleDialect whether convert
number(1) to BooleanType
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Support can config OracleDialect wheth
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18195
**[Test build #77720 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77720/testReport)**
for PR 18195 at commit
[`febdf69`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/fe
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18159
**[Test build #77721 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77721/testReport)**
for PR 18159 at commit
[`775d2c2`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/77
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18195
**[Test build #77720 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77720/testReport)**
for PR 18195 at commit
[`febdf69`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/f
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18195
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77720/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18195
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18159
**[Test build #77717 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77717/testReport)**
for PR 18159 at commit
[`de069e7`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/d
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18159
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18159
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77717/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16986#discussion_r120014990
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/objects/objects.scala
---
@@ -652,6 +653,299 @@ case class MapObjects pri
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16986#discussion_r120015031
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/objects/objects.scala
---
@@ -652,6 +653,299 @@ case class MapObjects pri
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16986#discussion_r120015023
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/objects/objects.scala
---
@@ -652,6 +653,299 @@ case class MapObjects pri
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18193#discussion_r120015133
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/PruneFileSourcePartitions.scala
---
@@ -59,7 +60,10 @@ private[sql] object P
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17953
ok to test
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17953
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18183
**[Test build #77722 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77722/testReport)**
for PR 18183 at commit
[`88a0b24`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/88
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17953
**[Test build #77723 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77723/testReport)**
for PR 17953 at commit
[`fda353f`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/fd
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18159
**[Test build #77718 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77718/testReport)**
for PR 18159 at commit
[`82de2a3`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/8
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18159
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18159
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77718/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18159
**[Test build #77719 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77719/testReport)**
for PR 18159 at commit
[`ba1070b`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/b
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18159
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18159
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77719/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18159
**[Test build #77721 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77721/testReport)**
for PR 18159 at commit
[`775d2c2`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/7
Github user felixcheung commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18128
ok, thanks, i guess it could be set as `0L` but this is good.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18159
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18159
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77721/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17953
shall we add a test case for `CREATE TABLE t(a void)` to make sure it still
fails?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well.
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17953
I think a safer fix is to just handle "void" specially in
`HiveClientImpl.fromHiveColumn`
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17953
oh actually users can still create a table with null type column via
`Catalog.createTable`, seems it's ok to support "void" in our parser, but add a
new rule to throw exception if users wanna crea
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13171
Yea, I just happened to ping here and there. Thanks for bearing with my
ping.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17953
**[Test build #77723 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77723/testReport)**
for PR 17953 at commit
[`fda353f`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/f
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17953
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17953
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77723/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18183
**[Test build #77722 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77722/testReport)**
for PR 18183 at commit
[`88a0b24`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/8
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18183
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18183
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77722/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user michalsenkyr commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16986
So I tried to simplify the code as much as possible, removing unneeded
parameters. I must admit I am not entirely sure about whether I am handling all
the data types correctly but everything se
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18189
But isn't it in a hint? If you are worried about user, I'd just change it
to "broadcast".
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18183
Thanks! Merging to master.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and w
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18183
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
GitHub user gatorsmile opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18196
[SPARK-20976] [SQL] Unify Error Messages for FAILFAST mode
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Before 2.2, we indicate the job was terminated because of `FAILFAST` mode.
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18196#discussion_r120020584
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/json/JacksonParser.scala
---
@@ -278,7 +278,7 @@ class JacksonParser(
//
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18196
cc @cloud-fan
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18196
**[Test build #77724 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/77724/testReport)**
for PR 18196 at commit
[`091062a`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/09
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16928#discussion_r120021921
--- Diff: python/pyspark/sql/readwriter.py ---
@@ -191,10 +191,13 @@ def json(self, path, schema=None,
primitivesAsString=None, prefersDecimal=None,
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16986#discussion_r120022281
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/objects/objects.scala
---
@@ -652,6 +653,218 @@ case class MapObjects pri
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16986#discussion_r120022295
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/objects/objects.scala
---
@@ -652,6 +653,218 @@ case class MapObjects pri
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16986#discussion_r120022302
--- Diff: sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/SQLImplicits.scala
---
@@ -166,6 +167,10 @@ abstract class SQLImplicits extends
LowPrioritySQLImpl
1 - 100 of 206 matches
Mail list logo
