Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16028
**[Test build #78960 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78960/testReport)**
for PR 16028 at commit
[`6bb1daf`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/6b
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18424
Have you done actual benchmarks to validate that this is a perf improvement?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your pro
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18479
**[Test build #78959 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78959/testReport)**
for PR 18479 at commit
[`9c32d25`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/9c
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18469
Can we minimize the change by just adding this method to PlanTest? It's not
that many lines of code.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on Gi
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16028
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16028
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78956/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16028
**[Test build #78956 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78956/testReport)**
for PR 16028 at commit
[`39ea8e1`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/3
Github user actuaryzhang commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18481
Ahh, forgot about the window functions. This is actually the last set...
@felixcheung @HyukjinKwon
**
for PR 18481 at commit
[`e7d19a3`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/e7
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18480
**[Test build #78958 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78958/testReport)**
for PR 18480 at commit
[`d8df5e0`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/d8
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18470
ah the spilling logic is not in 2.1, let me revert it, sorry for the
trouble.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If yo
GitHub user actuaryzhang opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18481
[SPARK-20889][SparkR] Grouped documentation for WINDOW column methods
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Grouped documentation for column window methods.
You can mer
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16028
**[Test build #78953 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78953/testReport)**
for PR 16028 at commit
[`b907314`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/b
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18480
cc @gatorsmile
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17758
It's a little messy about where we need to add this check, @maropu can you
give a summary about it? thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply a
GitHub user viirya opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18480
[SPARK-21052][SQL][Follow-up] Add hash map metrics to join
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Remove `numHashCollisions` in `BytesToBytesMap`. And change
`getAverageProbesP
Github user zzcclp commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18470
Hi, @cloud-fan , @hvanhovell , after merging this pr into **branch-2.1**,
there are some errors:
1.
`value WINDOW_EXEC_BUFFER_SPILL_THRESHOLD is not a member of object
org.apache.spark.sql.in
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16028
**[Test build #78956 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78956/testReport)**
for PR 16028 at commit
[`39ea8e1`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/39
Github user maropu commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17758#discussion_r124973610
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/catalog/SessionCatalog.scala
---
@@ -353,7 +341,10 @@ class SessionCatalog(
val
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18023
**[Test build #78955 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78955/testReport)**
for PR 18023 at commit
[`4e36ed9`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/4e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16028
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16028
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78953/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18479
**[Test build #78954 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78954/testReport)**
for PR 18479 at commit
[`94fb669`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/94
Github user janewangfb commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18023#discussion_r124973097
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/unresolved.scala
---
@@ -307,6 +311,28 @@ case class UnresolvedStar(target:
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17758#discussion_r124972759
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/catalog/SessionCatalog.scala
---
@@ -353,7 +341,10 @@ class SessionCatalog(
GitHub user rxin opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18479
WIP - stat propagation code using mixin
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
TBD
## How was this patch tested?
Should be covered by existing test cases.
You can merge t
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16028
**[Test build #78953 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78953/testReport)**
for PR 16028 at commit
[`b907314`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/b9
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18334#discussion_r124971615
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/internal/SQLConf.scala ---
@@ -774,6 +774,12 @@ object SQLConf {
.doubleConf
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18334#discussion_r124971431
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/command/ddl.scala ---
@@ -437,7 +437,20 @@ case class AlterTableAddPartitionCommand(
Github user falaki commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14431
@NarineK how about adding this as a new API e.g., `gapplyWithKeys()`. I am
extremely worried about the semantic change. It can break existing SparkR
applications and will be confusing for users.
--
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18445#discussion_r124970124
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/jdbc/JdbcUtils.scala
---
@@ -266,10 +266,14 @@ object JdbcUtils extends Log
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18445#discussion_r124970067
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/jdbc/JdbcUtils.scala
---
@@ -266,10 +266,14 @@ object JdbcUtils extends Log
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18445#discussion_r124970022
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/jdbc/JdbcUtils.scala
---
@@ -290,7 +294,11 @@ object JdbcUtils extends Logg
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18465
> isn't being "terminated" enough? that we have to pskill it again?
Indeed, this is the point. I really tested so many times but `exit` does
not terminate (I think I might have to change
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18458
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
Github user guoxiaolongzte commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18464#discussion_r124969031
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/worker/ui/WorkerPage.scala ---
@@ -112,7 +112,15 @@ private[ui] class WorkerPage(parent: Worker
Github user felixcheung commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18458
merged to master. thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and w
Github user actuaryzhang commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18458
@felixcheung This is the last set of this doc update. Once it gets in, I
will do another pass to fix any styles or consistency issue.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to th
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18478
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18478
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78947/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user jerryshao commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18430
let's do this in another PR, seems a different threading issue.
Also would you please change the PR title like: Change fileToAppInfo in
FsHistoryProvider to fix concurrent issue.
---
If
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18478
**[Test build #78947 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78947/testReport)**
for PR 18478 at commit
[`8295b3c`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/8
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18436
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the fe
Github user zenglinxi0615 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18430
sorry, it's a typing error, i mean the related JIRA: SPARK-21078.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your proje
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17899#discussion_r124966795
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/Optimizer.scala
---
@@ -610,6 +611,25 @@ object CollapseWindow extends Rul
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17935
The reason I found out about this is because the one of the widely
circulated TPC-DS benchmark harness online uses this.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have you
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17899#discussion_r124966455
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/Optimizer.scala
---
@@ -610,6 +611,25 @@ object CollapseWindow extends Rul
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17935
Sorry, to be accurate, for the syntax of derived table in SQL, the
databases I listed above are commonly seen in the market, and they don't
support it without alias name. SQL 2003 grammar also doesn'
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18458
**[Test build #78949 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78949/testReport)**
for PR 18458 at commit
[`8be3e49`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/8
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18458
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18458
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78949/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user ouyangxiaochen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17681
@felixcheung Thank you very much!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
en
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18436
**[Test build #78952 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78952/testReport)**
for PR 18436 at commit
[`12347e6`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/12
Github user jerryshao commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18430
What's the issue of SPARK-13988?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user maropu commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18436#discussion_r124965300
--- Diff: sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/Column.scala ---
@@ -464,7 +464,15 @@ class Column(val expr: Expression) extends Logging {
* @g
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17681
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17681
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78946/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18471
**[Test build #78951 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78951/testReport)**
for PR 18471 at commit
[`fd5bde5`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/fd
Github user gengliangwang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18471#discussion_r124964773
--- Diff: scalastyle-config.xml ---
@@ -245,7 +245,13 @@ This file is divided into 3 sections:
- COMMA
+ COLO
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17681
**[Test build #78946 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78946/testReport)**
for PR 17681 at commit
[`b49280a`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/b
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17935
I don't think that argument is useful at all. For example, none of the
other databases support the DataFrame API. Does that mean few users will write
DataFrame code?
---
If your project is set up fo
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18023#discussion_r124964462
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/unresolved.scala
---
@@ -307,6 +311,28 @@ case class UnresolvedStar(target:
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18436#discussion_r124963887
--- Diff: sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/Column.scala ---
@@ -464,7 +464,15 @@ class Column(val expr: Expression) extends Logging {
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18436
**[Test build #78950 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78950/testReport)**
for PR 18436 at commit
[`be56898`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/be
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18436
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so
Github user jiangxb1987 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18464#discussion_r124963695
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/worker/ui/WorkerPage.scala ---
@@ -112,7 +112,15 @@ private[ui] class WorkerPage(parent: WorkerWeb
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18388#discussion_r124963673
--- Diff: docs/configuration.md ---
@@ -614,6 +614,34 @@ Apart from these, the following properties are also
available, and may be useful
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16056#discussion_r124963500
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/encoders/RowEncoder.scala
---
@@ -96,28 +96,32 @@ object RowEncoder {
Da
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18266
I am fine to support customized schema for read path of JDBC relation.
However, we need to check whether the user-specified schema matches the
underlying the table schema. If not matched, we need
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18458
**[Test build #78949 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78949/testReport)**
for PR 18458 at commit
[`8be3e49`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/8b
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16056#discussion_r124963200
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/JavaTypeInference.scala
---
@@ -216,23 +216,26 @@ object JavaTypeInference {
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18266#discussion_r124963184
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/jdbc/JDBCOptions.scala
---
@@ -120,6 +120,7 @@ class JDBCOptions(
//
Github user jiangxb1987 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18474
We should not need this, because in `afterEach()` we will stop each store,
which should clear both the memoryStore and the disk blocks.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to th
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18266#discussion_r124962985
--- Diff: sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/jdbc/JDBCSuite.scala
---
@@ -907,7 +907,7 @@ class JDBCSuite extends SparkFunSuite
assert
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18448
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18470
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18470
thanks, merging to master/2.2/2.1!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enable
Github user felixcheung commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18448
merged to master.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18464#discussion_r124962728
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/worker/ui/WorkerPage.scala ---
@@ -112,7 +112,15 @@ private[ui] class WorkerPage(parent: WorkerWebUI
Github user kiszk commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18468
@cloud-fan Could you review this?
As we discussed at Spark Summit, I prepared a new ColumnVector for
compressed column using the current schemes. Any comments are appreciated.
---
If your project
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18468
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78944/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18468
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user felixcheung commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18465
hmm, this is a fairly small but crucial change.
One point we were discussing, earlier, we are saying that we don't know if
the child is going away, or merely slow starting, so we explicitly s
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18468
**[Test build #78944 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78944/testReport)**
for PR 18468 at commit
[`514400c`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/5
Github user jiangxb1987 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18474
We should not need this, because in `afterEach()` we will stop each store.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18307#discussion_r124961333
--- Diff: sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/Dataset.scala ---
@@ -2205,37 +2205,170 @@ class Dataset[T] private[sql](
* // max 9
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14431
https://github.com/apache/spark/blob/master/sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/RelationalGroupedDataset.scala#L51
You just need to change the above line
```
val groupin
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18473
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78945/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18473
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user felixcheung commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17681
there's an issue causing `fails due to an unknown error code` - if you
haven't rebase, rebase to master should eliminate it
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18473
**[Test build #78945 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78945/testReport)**
for PR 18473 at commit
[`c5084a3`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/c
Github user felixcheung commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18474
hi - I don't think `[SPARKR]` in the title is right. Sounds like this
should be `[core]`
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub a
Github user gf53520 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18477
test this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18471
**[Test build #78948 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78948/testReport)**
for PR 18471 at commit
[`05084a9`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/05
Github user zenglinxi0615 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18430
@srowen thanks for your suggestions again! and should I address the problem
of SPARK-13988 in this PR?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply ap
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18478
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
Github user zsxwing commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18478
Verified both Scala 2.10 and 2.11 build locally. Since Jenkins PR build
doesn't use Scala 2.10, I'm going to merge directly.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and h
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18467
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78943/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18467
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18467
**[Test build #78943 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78943/testReport)**
for PR 18467 at commit
[`b8f022e`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/b
1 - 100 of 619 matches
Mail list logo
