Github user hvanhovell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18483#discussion_r125034337
--- Diff:
common/unsafe/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/unsafe/types/UTF8String.java ---
@@ -1088,6 +1088,12 @@ public UTF8String clone() {
retur
Github user hvanhovell commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18483
LGTM - pending jenkins
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishe
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16028
**[Test build #78983 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78983/testReport)**
for PR 16028 at commit
[`d15ea65`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/d1
GitHub user dhruve opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18487
[SPARK-21243][Core] Limit no. of map outputs in a shuffle fetch
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
For configurations with external shuffle enabled, we have observed that if
a v
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18471#discussion_r125032760
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/broadcast/BroadcastManager.scala ---
@@ -52,8 +52,8 @@ private[spark] class BroadcastManager(
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18471#discussion_r125032238
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/broadcast/BroadcastManager.scala ---
@@ -52,8 +52,8 @@ private[spark] class BroadcastManager(
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18471
My only concern is `[K : ClassTag]`. This is conventional in scala but the
new style check rule rejects it. If it's hard to make a corrected rule for this
case, we can drop it.
---
If your proje
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18471#discussion_r125029078
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/broadcast/BroadcastManager.scala ---
@@ -52,8 +52,8 @@ private[spark] class BroadcastManager(
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18485
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18485
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78977/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18485
**[Test build #78977 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78977/testReport)**
for PR 18485 at commit
[`109cca9`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/1
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18430
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18430
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78974/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18438
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18430
**[Test build #78974 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78974/testReport)**
for PR 18430 at commit
[`a4f8054`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/a
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18485
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18485
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78976/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18438
thanks, merging to master!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wi
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18485
**[Test build #78976 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78976/testReport)**
for PR 18485 at commit
[`a77bca5`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/a
Github user hvanhovell commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16699
@yanboliang @actuaryzhang this PR breaks the scala-2.10 build:
```
[error]
/home/jenkins/workspace/spark-master-compile-maven-scala-2.10/mllib/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/regression
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18471#discussion_r125027002
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/Accumulable.scala ---
@@ -68,7 +68,9 @@ class Accumulable[R, T] private (
}
private[sp
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18483
**[Test build #78982 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78982/testReport)**
for PR 18483 at commit
[`cac8dc6`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/ca
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18471#discussion_r125026821
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/Accumulable.scala ---
@@ -68,7 +68,9 @@ class Accumulable[R, T] private (
}
private[sp
Github user MLnick commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18305#discussion_r125026593
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/optim/loss/RDDLossFunction.scala ---
@@ -62,8 +62,8 @@ private[ml] class RDDLossFunction[
val new
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18483#discussion_r125026257
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/InternalRow.scala ---
@@ -94,4 +108,21 @@ object InternalRow {
/** Return
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18174
**[Test build #78981 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78981/testReport)**
for PR 18174 at commit
[`62ccd4e`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/62
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18464
**[Test build #78980 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78980/testReport)**
for PR 18464 at commit
[`aa269a6`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/aa
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18174
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so,
Github user hvanhovell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18483#discussion_r125025743
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/InternalRow.scala ---
@@ -94,4 +108,21 @@ object InternalRow {
/** Retur
Github user hvanhovell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18483#discussion_r125025770
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/InternalRow.scala ---
@@ -94,4 +108,21 @@ object InternalRow {
/** Retur
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18464
ok to test
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if t
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18483#discussion_r125025642
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/codegen/GeneratedProjectionSuite.scala
---
@@ -172,4 +172,40 @@ class Gen
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18483#discussion_r125025561
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/InternalRow.scala ---
@@ -94,4 +108,21 @@ object InternalRow {
/** Return
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18483#discussion_r125025362
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/InternalRow.scala ---
@@ -94,4 +108,21 @@ object InternalRow {
/** Return
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18485
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78975/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18485
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18485
**[Test build #78975 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78975/testReport)**
for PR 18485 at commit
[`d3998f8`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/d
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18483#discussion_r125025226
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/InternalRow.scala ---
@@ -94,4 +108,21 @@ object InternalRow {
/** Return
Github user MLnick commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18305#discussion_r125024716
--- Diff:
mllib/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/optim/aggregator/LogisticAggregatorSuite.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,254 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apac
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18483
**[Test build #78979 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78979/testReport)**
for PR 18483 at commit
[`f630cbd`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/f6
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16699
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18483
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so,
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18483#discussion_r125023237
--- Diff:
common/unsafe/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/unsafe/types/UTF8String.java ---
@@ -1088,6 +1088,12 @@ public UTF8String clone() {
return
Github user yanboliang commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16699
Merged into master. Thanks for contribution and all reviews! This great
feature will benefit lots of users.
@actuaryzhang Could you send follow-up PRs to address the two inline
comments? Than
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18471#discussion_r125022780
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/broadcast/BroadcastManager.scala ---
@@ -52,8 +52,8 @@ private[spark] class BroadcastManager(
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18445
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18445
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78978/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18445
**[Test build #78978 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78978/testReport)**
for PR 18445 at commit
[`637ca0e`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/6
Github user ouyangxiaochen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17681
@gatorsmile @cloud-fan @HyukjinKwon Could you review this PR when you have
sometime? Thank you!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear o
Github user tdas commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16856
My PR to fix them https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18485
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not hav
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18334
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78972/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18334
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18334
**[Test build #78972 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78972/testReport)**
for PR 18334 at commit
[`db8a640`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/d
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18308
Ping @ihazem to update or close
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18471
I tend to agree with the style change, but, am concerned about what a huge
diff this creates for little gain. I personally am not sure I'd bother with the
colon change; some instances of space before
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18477#discussion_r125014855
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/regexpExpressions.scala
---
@@ -268,7 +268,7 @@ case class StringSplit(str:
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18486
This was a duplicate JIRA. See the original and its PR for more discussion.
I'm not sure this works.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on G
Github user ptkool commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17899#discussion_r125013340
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/Optimizer.scala
---
@@ -610,6 +611,25 @@ object CollapseWindow extends Rule[Lo
Github user ptkool commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17899#discussion_r125013283
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/Optimizer.scala
---
@@ -610,6 +611,25 @@ object CollapseWindow extends Rule[Lo
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18159
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18159
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78969/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user shuangshuangwang commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18445
Hi @gatorsmile ,
I have just pushed code changes as you suggested. Need i to add this value
as a property to class JDBCOptions?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to t
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18159
**[Test build #78969 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78969/testReport)**
for PR 18159 at commit
[`32f4abf`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/3
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18445
**[Test build #78978 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78978/testReport)**
for PR 18445 at commit
[`637ca0e`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/63
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18486
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feat
Github user tdas commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18485#discussion_r125009568
--- Diff: docs/_layouts/global.html ---
@@ -69,14 +69,14 @@
Programming Guides
GitHub user darionyaphet opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18486
[SPARK-21265][SQL] Cache method could specified name
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Currently when I cache dataset in my cluster I found the RDD Name is the
RDD S
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18485
**[Test build #78977 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78977/testReport)**
for PR 18485 at commit
[`109cca9`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/10
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18485
**[Test build #78976 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78976/testReport)**
for PR 18485 at commit
[`a77bca5`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/a7
Github user tdas commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18485#discussion_r125007301
--- Diff: docs/structured-streaming-programming-guide.md ---
@@ -1043,7 +1060,7 @@ streamingDf \
### Arbitrary Stateful Operations
-Many us
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18485
**[Test build #78975 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78975/testReport)**
for PR 18485 at commit
[`d3998f8`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/d3
GitHub user tdas opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18485
[SPARK-21267][SS][DOCS] Update Structured Streaming Documentation
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Few changes to the Structured Streaming documentation
- Clarify that t
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18480
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18480
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78962/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18480
**[Test build #78962 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78962/testReport)**
for PR 18480 at commit
[`d8df5e0`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/d
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18482
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18482
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78961/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18482
**[Test build #78961 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78961/testReport)**
for PR 18482 at commit
[`9802b85`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/9
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18159
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78968/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18159
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18159
**[Test build #78968 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78968/testReport)**
for PR 18159 at commit
[`1defb3a`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/1
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18174
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78967/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18174
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18174
**[Test build #78967 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78967/testReport)**
for PR 18174 at commit
[`62ccd4e`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/6
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18430
**[Test build #78974 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78974/testReport)**
for PR 18430 at commit
[`a4f8054`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/a4
Github user zenglinxi0615 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18430
test please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18483
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18483
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78964/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18483
**[Test build #78964 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78964/testReport)**
for PR 18483 at commit
[`f630cbd`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/f
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18479
**[Test build #3821 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/3821/testReport)**
for PR 18479 at commit
[`9c32d25`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17899
**[Test build #78973 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78973/testReport)**
for PR 17899 at commit
[`e2f24c2`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17899
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78973/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17899
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17899
**[Test build #78973 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78973/testReport)**
for PR 17899 at commit
[`e2f24c2`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/e2
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18436
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18436
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78963/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18436
**[Test build #78963 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78963/testReport)**
for PR 18436 at commit
[`12347e6`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/1
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18334
**[Test build #78972 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78972/testReport)**
for PR 18334 at commit
[`db8a640`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/db
Github user hvanhovell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18483#discussion_r124995524
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/InternalRow.scala ---
@@ -94,4 +108,21 @@ object InternalRow {
/** Retur
Github user hvanhovell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18483#discussion_r124995580
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/InternalRow.scala ---
@@ -94,4 +108,21 @@ object InternalRow {
/** Retur
301 - 400 of 496 matches
Mail list logo
