Github user hvanhovell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18483#discussion_r124984978
--- Diff:
common/unsafe/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/unsafe/types/UTF8String.java ---
@@ -1088,6 +1088,12 @@ public UTF8String clone() {
retur
Github user hvanhovell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18483#discussion_r124995623
--- Diff:
common/unsafe/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/unsafe/types/UTF8String.java ---
@@ -1088,6 +1088,12 @@ public UTF8String clone() {
retur
Github user hvanhovell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18483#discussion_r124988718
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/codegen/GeneratedProjectionSuite.scala
---
@@ -172,4 +172,40 @@ class Ge
Github user hvanhovell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18483#discussion_r124985506
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/InternalRow.scala ---
@@ -94,4 +108,21 @@ object InternalRow {
/** Retur
Github user jinxing64 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16989#discussion_r124995034
--- Diff:
common/network-shuffle/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/network/shuffle/OneForOneBlockFetcher.java
---
@@ -126,4 +150,38 @@ private void failRema
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18484
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18484
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78971/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18484
**[Test build #78971 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78971/testReport)**
for PR 18484 at commit
[`6ec509b`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/6
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16028
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16028
**[Test build #78966 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78966/testReport)**
for PR 16028 at commit
[`6bb1daf`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/6
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16028
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78966/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user Myasuka commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18452#discussion_r124988257
--- Diff:
streaming/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/rdd/WriteAheadLogBackedBlockRDD.scala
---
@@ -135,8 +135,11 @@ class WriteAheadLogBackedBlock
Github user guoxiaolongzte commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18464#discussion_r124987865
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/worker/ui/WorkerPage.scala ---
@@ -24,7 +24,7 @@ import scala.xml.Node
import org.json4s.J
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18484
**[Test build #78971 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78971/testReport)**
for PR 18484 at commit
[`6ec509b`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/6e
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18484
cc @ueshin, could you take a look please when you have some time?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
GitHub user HyukjinKwon opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18484
[SPARK-21224][PYTHON] Call cross join path in PySpark join with 'how'
speicified rather than throwing NPE
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Currently, it throws a NPE
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18481
**[Test build #78965 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78965/testReport)**
for PR 18481 at commit
[`e7d19a3`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18481
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78965/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18481
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user wzhfy commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18334
@rxin Currently we are re-calculating the stats. If we want to support
incremental stats update, we may need to maintain some specific data
structures. e.g. for ndv in column stats, store data structu
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18159#discussion_r124982973
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/command/commands.scala
---
@@ -19,25 +19,70 @@ package org.apache.spark.sql.execution.comma
Github user jiangxb1987 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18430#discussion_r124982910
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/history/FsHistoryProvider.scala ---
@@ -19,7 +19,7 @@ package org.apache.spark.deploy.history
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18430
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18430
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78970/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18430
**[Test build #78970 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78970/testReport)**
for PR 18430 at commit
[`fde0d34`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/f
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18430
**[Test build #78970 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78970/testReport)**
for PR 18430 at commit
[`fde0d34`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/fd
Github user maropu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17758
ok, I'll recheck the policy and put the summary here.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have thi
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18430
ok to test
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if t
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18159
**[Test build #78969 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78969/testReport)**
for PR 18159 at commit
[`32f4abf`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/32
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18159
**[Test build #78968 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78968/testReport)**
for PR 18159 at commit
[`1defb3a`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/1d
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18174
**[Test build #78967 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78967/testReport)**
for PR 18174 at commit
[`62ccd4e`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/62
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18159#discussion_r124979471
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/util/Utils.scala ---
@@ -2659,6 +2668,21 @@ private[spark] object Utils extends Logging {
redact(redac
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18475
This is just a typo and is so minor... maybe you can just include it in
other related PRs of yours
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18174
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so,
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18481
**[Test build #78965 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78965/testReport)**
for PR 18481 at commit
[`e7d19a3`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/e7
Github user jiangxb1987 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18430
Also Please change the title as mentioned above. Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16028
**[Test build #78966 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78966/testReport)**
for PR 16028 at commit
[`6bb1daf`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/6b
Github user zhengruifeng commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16028
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18483
**[Test build #78964 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78964/testReport)**
for PR 18483 at commit
[`f630cbd`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/f6
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18483#discussion_r124978721
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/window/AggregateProcessor.scala
---
@@ -145,13 +145,10 @@ private[window] final class Ag
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18483
cc @hvanhovell @gatorsmile @liancheng
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
en
Github user actuaryzhang commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18481
jenkins, retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled an
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18483#discussion_r124978673
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/aggregate/SortBasedAggregationIterator.scala
---
@@ -86,17 +86,6 @@ class SortBasedAggre
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18483#discussion_r124978492
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/codegen/GenerateSafeProjection.scala
---
@@ -131,8 +131,6 @@ object Gener
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18483#discussion_r124978458
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/Cast.scala
---
@@ -1047,7 +1047,7 @@ case class Cast(child: Expression, d
GitHub user cloud-fan opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18483
[SPARK-17528][SQL] data should be copied properly before saving into
InternalRow
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
For performance reasons, `UnsafeRow.getString`, `getS
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18436
**[Test build #78963 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78963/testReport)**
for PR 18436 at commit
[`12347e6`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/12
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18436
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18334#discussion_r124977705
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/command/ddl.scala ---
@@ -437,7 +437,20 @@ case class AlterTableAddPartitionCommand(
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18334
Can the stats be updated incrementally?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabl
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18479
**[Test build #3821 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/3821/testReport)**
for PR 18479 at commit
[`9c32d25`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/9
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18301
Let me rephrase my question. Why users care the `average number of probe`,
if they already know `average number of collision`?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email a
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18301
`average number of probes` will be 1 if no collision, right?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does n
Github user wzhfy commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18334#discussion_r124977390
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/internal/SQLConf.scala ---
@@ -774,6 +774,12 @@ object SQLConf {
.doubleConf
Github user wzhfy commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18334#discussion_r124977456
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/command/ddl.scala ---
@@ -437,7 +437,20 @@ case class AlterTableAddPartitionCommand(
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18480
Also `timeSpentResizingNs`
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and w
Github user JonathanTaws commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15405
@jiang Quite busy at the moment, will take care of it as soon as possible.
I'll ping you once it's done
Le 25 juin 2017 16:33, "Jiang Xingbo" a écrit :
ping @JonathanTaws
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18469
Sure
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the fe
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18482
**[Test build #78961 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78961/testReport)**
for PR 18482 at commit
[`9802b85`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/98
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18480
**[Test build #78962 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78962/testReport)**
for PR 18480 at commit
[`d8df5e0`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/d8
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18480
retest this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, o
Github user IngoSchuster commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18437
Thank you all for your support!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enable
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18471
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78948/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18471
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18436
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18471
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18436
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78950/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18471
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78951/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18436
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78952/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18436
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18481
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78957/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18481
**[Test build #78957 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78957/testReport)**
for PR 18481 at commit
[`e7d19a3`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18479
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78959/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18479
**[Test build #78959 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78959/testReport)**
for PR 18479 at commit
[`9c32d25`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/9
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18471
**[Test build #78948 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78948/testReport)**
for PR 18471 at commit
[`05084a9`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/0
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16028
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78960/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18023
**[Test build #78955 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78955/testReport)**
for PR 18023 at commit
[`4e36ed9`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/4
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18436
**[Test build #78950 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78950/testReport)**
for PR 18436 at commit
[`be56898`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/b
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18481
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18480
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78958/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18023
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18480
**[Test build #78958 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78958/testReport)**
for PR 18480 at commit
[`d8df5e0`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/d
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18436
**[Test build #78952 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78952/testReport)**
for PR 18436 at commit
[`12347e6`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/1
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18471
**[Test build #78951 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78951/testReport)**
for PR 18471 at commit
[`fd5bde5`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/f
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18479
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18479
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78954/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18479
**[Test build #78954 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78954/testReport)**
for PR 18479 at commit
[`94fb669`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/9
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18480
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16028
**[Test build #78960 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78960/testReport)**
for PR 16028 at commit
[`6bb1daf`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/6
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18023
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/78955/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18479
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16028
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18479#discussion_r124976032
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/catalog/interface.scala
---
@@ -438,7 +438,7 @@ case class CatalogRelation(
GitHub user jinxing64 reopened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18482
[SPARK-21262][WIP] Stop sending 'stream request' when shuffle blocks.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
In current code, client will fetch the remote huge blocks to di
Github user jinxing64 closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18482
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
GitHub user jinxing64 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18482
Stop sending 'stream request' when shuffle blocks.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
In current code, client will fetch the remote huge blocks to disk. It is
implemente
401 - 496 of 496 matches
Mail list logo
