Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19029
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19029
Merged to master
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or i
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19066#discussion_r135450475
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/java/test/org/apache/spark/sql/JavaDatasetSuite.java ---
@@ -1302,16 +1302,8 @@ public void setUrl(String url) {
}
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19066
cc @mike0sv @srowen @gatorsmile
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
GitHub user cloud-fan opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19066
[SPARK-21255][SQL] simplify encoder for java enum
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This is a follow-up for https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18488, to
simplify the
GitHub user WeichenXu123 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19065
[SPARK-21729][ML][TEST] Generic test for ProbabilisticClassifier to ensure
consistent output columns
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Add test for prediction using
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19055
I am not familiar with ORC. Above is just a quick look about the changes
made in this PR.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub a
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19055#discussion_r135449484
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/internal/SQLConf.scala ---
@@ -322,6 +322,15 @@ object SQLConf {
.booleanConf
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19055#discussion_r135449118
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/orc/OrcOptions.scala ---
@@ -20,30 +20,35 @@ package org.apache.spark.sql.hive.orc
impor
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19055#discussion_r135449049
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/orc/OrcOptions.scala ---
@@ -20,30 +20,35 @@ package org.apache.spark.sql.hive.orc
impor
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19064
Yes. This is a potential optimization we should do, but it should be cost
based. Let us improve the resolution logics using this common base trait in
this PR first.
---
If your project is set u
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19064#discussion_r135446631
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/ScalaUDF.scala
---
@@ -22,6 +22,9 @@ import
org.apache.spark.sql.cataly
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19050#discussion_r135443202
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/subquery.scala
---
@@ -98,6 +99,11 @@ object RewritePredicateSubquery extends
GitHub user gengliangwang opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19064
[SPARK-21848][SQL] Add trait UDFType to identify user-defined functions
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Add trait UDFType to identify user-defined functions.
U
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19050
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/81173/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19050
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19050
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19050
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/81172/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19050
**[Test build #81172 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/81172/testReport)**
for PR 19050 at commit
[`121ad5a`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/1
Github user ueshin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18787#discussion_r135439310
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/vectorized/ColumnarBatchSuite.scala
---
@@ -1261,4 +1264,55 @@ class ColumnarBatchSuite ext
Github user ueshin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18787#discussion_r135439372
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/vectorized/ColumnarBatchSuite.scala
---
@@ -1261,4 +1264,55 @@ class ColumnarBatchSuite ext
Github user ueshin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18787#discussion_r135439793
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/arrow/ArrowConvertersSuite.scala
---
@@ -1629,6 +1632,39 @@ class ArrowConvertersSuite exte
Github user ueshin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18787#discussion_r135439857
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/arrow/ArrowConvertersSuite.scala
---
@@ -1629,6 +1632,39 @@ class ArrowConvertersSuite exte
Github user ueshin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18787#discussion_r135438683
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/arrow/ArrowConverters.scala
---
@@ -111,6 +125,66 @@ private[sql] object ArrowConverters {
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19050
**[Test build #81173 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/81173/testReport)**
for PR 19050 at commit
[`bf07e2a`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/bf
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18581
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/81170/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18581
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18581
**[Test build #81170 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/81170/testReport)**
for PR 18581 at commit
[`41369cf`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/4
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19050
**[Test build #81172 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/81172/testReport)**
for PR 19050 at commit
[`121ad5a`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/12
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19050#discussion_r135434713
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/subquery.scala
---
@@ -98,6 +99,11 @@ object RewritePredicateSubquery extends
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19029
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/81171/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19029
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19029
**[Test build #81171 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/81171/testReport)**
for PR 19029 at commit
[`c40eba3`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/c
Github user maropu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19062
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the featur
Github user maropu commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19062#discussion_r135430732
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/SparkPlan.scala ---
@@ -370,8 +373,7 @@ abstract class SparkPlan extends QueryPlan[SparkPlan
Github user WeichenXu123 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19018
ping @felixcheung We can make all R tests for trees deterministic (not only
random trees). Leave other problems to separate PR. It would be great to fix it
soon, Thanks!
---
If your project i
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19029
**[Test build #81171 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/81171/testReport)**
for PR 19029 at commit
[`c40eba3`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/c4
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18581
**[Test build #81170 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/81170/testReport)**
for PR 18581 at commit
[`41369cf`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/41
Github user guoxiaolongzte commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19049#discussion_r135427302
--- Diff: core/src/main/resources/org/apache/spark/ui/static/historypage.js
---
@@ -136,6 +136,16 @@ $(document).ready(function() {
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19061
Hi, @vanzin .
Could you review this when you have sometime? I'm wondering if this is
implemented correctly in a way you expected. Please let me know if there is
something to do more. Thank
Github user maropu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19031
ok, I'll close for now. Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user maropu closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19031
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
Github user logannc commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18945
Sorry for the delay. Things got busy and now there is the storm in Houston.
Will update this per these suggestions soon.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have y
Github user mdespriee commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17461
I updated the example following your suggestion. It's more consistent with
LDAExample this way.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on Git
Github user ArtRand commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18837
Hello @vanzin, thanks for the review. I added `.toSequence` to the new
configuration specs, certainly a nice solution to parsing on the fly. Please
let me know if there is anything else that needs c
Github user hhbyyh commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18610#discussion_r135418170
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/regression/LinearRegression.scala ---
@@ -226,6 +246,12 @@ class LinearRegression @Since("1.3.0")
(@Since
Github user hhbyyh commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18610#discussion_r135418289
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/regression/LinearRegression.scala ---
@@ -72,6 +72,22 @@ private[regression] trait LinearRegressionParams
Github user skonto commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7842
@coderxiang what is the plan for this?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enable
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16992
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/81169/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16992
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16992
**[Test build #81169 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/81169/testReport)**
for PR 16992 at commit
[`3d6c80b`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/3
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16992
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16992
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/81168/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16992
**[Test build #81168 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/81168/testReport)**
for PR 16992 at commit
[`77cfb03`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/7
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19055
Hi, @gatorsmile .
Could you review this ORC configuration PR?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user dongjoon-hyun closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19063
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19063
I'm closing this PR because the numbers are different than what I expected
before.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as we
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19060
For Parquet, I can find
[TestInputOutputFormat.java](https://github.com/Parquet/parquet-mr/blob/master/parquet-hadoop/src/test/java/parquet/hadoop/example/TestInputOutputFormat.java).
Parquet
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19063
I saw that, too. Right. It becomes meaningless. Some is reduced but the
other increase. I'm trying to do another approche in this PR and JIRA. I will
update more.
---
If your project is set
Github user hhbyyh commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18610
Just to confirm, so we have agreed that the initialModel should be of type
[T <: Model[T]] rather than a String type (path to the saved model)? Sorry I
didn't find the related discussion.
---
If yo
Github user JohnHBrock commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18610
Is there anymore work to do before this can get merged?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not ha
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19031
This is an internal conf. For the advanced users, we do not encourage them
to disable it. If they want to disable it, they can simply set it to a number
above 8000. Thus, setting `maxLinesPerFunc
Github user kiszk commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19062#discussion_r135416594
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/SparkPlan.scala ---
@@ -54,6 +54,9 @@ abstract class SparkPlan extends QueryPlan[SparkPlan]
Github user heary-cao commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18961
@dongjoon-hyun @cloud-fan Do you have any suggestions?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not hav
Github user heary-cao commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19062
+1,LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user erenavsarogullari commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16992
Hi @squito,
Thanks for the review this patch. It is ready to re-review / merge.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on Git
Github user erenavsarogullari commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16992#discussion_r135415731
--- Diff: docs/job-scheduling.md ---
@@ -235,7 +235,7 @@ properties:
of the cluster. By default, each pool's `minShare` is 0.
The
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16992
**[Test build #81169 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/81169/testReport)**
for PR 16992 at commit
[`3d6c80b`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/3d
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18966#discussion_r135415687
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/codegen/CodeGenerator.scala
---
@@ -769,16 +769,27 @@ class CodegenConte
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16992
**[Test build #81168 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/81168/testReport)**
for PR 16992 at commit
[`77cfb03`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/77
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18581#discussion_r135415452
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/HadoopFileLinesReader.scala
---
@@ -32,7 +32,9 @@ import
org.apache.hadoop
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19063
- org.apache.spark.sql.hive 10 min
- org.apache.spark.sql.hive.client 6 min 20 sec
- org.apache.spark.sql.hive.execution 28 min
- org.apache.spark.sql.hive.orc 2 min 1 sec
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19060
I mean, how about Parquet and the others? Do they have the e2e test cases
in their projects?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHu
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19029#discussion_r135411403
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/optim/WeightedLeastSquares.scala ---
@@ -439,8 +439,9 @@ private[ml] object WeightedLeastSquares {
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19029
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19029
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/81167/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19029
**[Test build #81167 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/81167/testReport)**
for PR 19029 at commit
[`21e7ff7`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/2
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18581
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18581
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/81166/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18581
**[Test build #81166 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/81166/testReport)**
for PR 18581 at commit
[`08233e6`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/0
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19029
**[Test build #81167 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/81167/testReport)**
for PR 19029 at commit
[`21e7ff7`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/21
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19063
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19063
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/81163/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19063
**[Test build #81163 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/81163/testReport)**
for PR 19063 at commit
[`557b0c6`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/5
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18581
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/81165/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18581
**[Test build #81165 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/81165/testReport)**
for PR 18581 at commit
[`cbed415`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/c
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18581
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18581
**[Test build #81166 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/81166/testReport)**
for PR 18581 at commit
[`08233e6`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/08
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18581
**[Test build #81164 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/81164/testReport)**
for PR 18581 at commit
[`9b1bf10`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/9
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18581
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/81164/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18581
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18581
**[Test build #81165 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/81165/testReport)**
for PR 18581 at commit
[`cbed415`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/cb
Github user YuvalItzchakov commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19059#discussion_r135405801
--- Diff:
external/kafka-0-10-sql/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/kafka010/CachedKafkaConsumer.scala
---
@@ -125,8 +131,11 @@ private[kafka010]
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18581
**[Test build #81164 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/81164/testReport)**
for PR 18581 at commit
[`9b1bf10`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/9b
Github user kiszk commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18966
ping @gatorsmile
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or i
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18581#discussion_r135405534
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/HadoopFileLinesReader.scala
---
@@ -32,7 +32,9 @@ import
org.apache.hadoo
Github user YuvalItzchakov commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18928
Right. We've had some problems with reading snapshots after executors dying
on OOM, I hope this does the trick :)
Thanks.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19058
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19058
Merged to master
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or i
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19063
**[Test build #81163 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/81163/testReport)**
for PR 19063 at commit
[`557b0c6`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/55
1 - 100 of 105 matches
Mail list logo
