Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20825
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20857
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20881
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20869
**[Test build #4173 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/4173/testReport)**
for PR 20869 at commit
Github user gengliangwang commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21273
LGTM, it would be nice to have a micro-benmark suite in this PR.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21298
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21311
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21311
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21298
Merged to master.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
GitHub user cxzl25 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21311
[SPARK-24257][SQL]LongToUnsafeRowMap calculate the new size may be wrong
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
LongToUnsafeRowMap
Calculate the new size simply by
Github user gengliangwang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21247#discussion_r187769734
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/json/JSONOptions.scala
---
@@ -138,3 +121,40 @@ private[sql] class JSONOptions(
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21298
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21298
**[Test build #90539 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/90539/testReport)**
for PR 21298 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21298
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/90539/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user mgaido91 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21246#discussion_r187769261
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/maskExpressions.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,569 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to
Github user mgaido91 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21309
@rxin I also always had some problems in understanding which functions are
available and which not. I think it is quite confusing for a user. I am
wondering: what do you think if we automatically
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21298
**[Test build #90539 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/90539/testReport)**
for PR 21298 at commit
Github user sujith71955 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20611
@kevinyu98
Spark supports wildcards characters in both local and non local scenarios,
the only restriction spark imposes is using wildcards in folder names of the
local file-system path ,
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21310
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21310
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
GitHub user fangshil opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21310
[SPARK-24256][SQL] SPARK-24256: ExpressionEncoder should support
user-defined types as fields of Scala case class and tuple
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Right now,
101 - 121 of 121 matches
Mail list logo
