Github user steveloughran commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22009#discussion_r208317741
--- Diff:
external/kafka-0-10-sql/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/kafka010/KafkaSourceProvider.scala
---
@@ -270,11 +269,11 @@ private[kafka010]
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21977
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22004
**[Test build #4235 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/4235/testReport)**
for PR 22004 at commit
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22004
I'd like to merge this as it resolves one class of issues the 2.12 build,
and I don't think the adjustments to Spark are wrong per se. It may be that
something else happens on the Scala side or
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21977
**[Test build #94386 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/94386/testReport)**
for PR 21977 at commit
Github user rdblue commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21977
Okay, workers are tracked in `PythonWorkerFactory`. Its `create` method
returns an idle worker if one is available. When a task finishes, it calls
`SparkEnv.releasePythonWorker` that calls
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21978
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/94375/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21978
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21978
**[Test build #94375 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/94375/testReport)**
for PR 21978 at commit
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21986
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org
Github user ueshin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21986
Thanks! merging to master.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20184
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user rdblue commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21977
Posting this as a comment instead of in a thread so it doesn't get lost. In
response to @holdenk's question about memory allocation to workers:
That `useDaemon` flag controls whether
Github user rdblue commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21977#discussion_r208310790
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/api/python/PythonRunner.scala ---
@@ -60,14 +61,26 @@ private[spark] object PythonEvalType {
*/
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22020
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21305
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/94373/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21305
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22020
Merged to master
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21305
**[Test build #94373 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/94373/testReport)**
for PR 21305 at commit
Github user shaneknapp commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21845
i'm also more than happy to bump the timeout in the PRB build, but i think
that's just putting duct tape on a band-aid and spray painting it to hide the
layers of tape.
the builds and
Github user rdblue commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21948#discussion_r208305810
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/streaming/MemorySinkV2Suite.scala
---
@@ -44,16 +46,16 @@ class MemorySinkV2Suite extends
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22030
**[Test build #94385 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/94385/testReport)**
for PR 22030 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22030
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user MaxGekk commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22030
@maryannxue Please, have a look at the PR.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22030
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user dbtsai commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21991
Thanks all!
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user rdblue commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21977#discussion_r208302473
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/api/python/PythonRunner.scala ---
@@ -60,14 +61,26 @@ private[spark] object PythonEvalType {
*/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21986
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21986
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/94371/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user vincent-grosbois commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22024
Actually I spoke too soon!
We spotted some regression in TorrentBroadcast:
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21986
**[Test build #94371 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/94371/testReport)**
for PR 21986 at commit
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22027
LGTM
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22006
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22006
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/94368/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user rdblue commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21978
@cloud-fan, that's fine with me since #17185 is already merged. Would this
conflict with #17185? We can just add a case that detects whether the first
identifier in the seq is a catalog when
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22006
**[Test build #94368 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/94368/testReport)**
for PR 22006 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22021
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22021
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/94370/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22021
**[Test build #94370 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/94370/testReport)**
for PR 22021 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18323
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/94376/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18323
Build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands,
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18323
**[Test build #94376 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/94376/testReport)**
for PR 18323 at commit
Github user Achuth17 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21608#discussion_r208295767
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/DataSourceUtils.scala
---
@@ -49,4 +51,11 @@ object DataSourceUtils {
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21305
**[Test build #94384 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/94384/testReport)**
for PR 21305 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21305
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21305
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22022
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22022
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/94374/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22022
**[Test build #94374 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/94374/testReport)**
for PR 22022 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22029
**[Test build #94382 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/94382/testReport)**
for PR 22029 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22006
**[Test build #94383 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/94383/testReport)**
for PR 22006 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22029
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22029
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user mgaido91 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22006
retest this please
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user mgaido91 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22029
cc @cloud-fan @hvanhovell @juliuszsompolski
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
GitHub user mgaido91 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22029
[SPARK-24395][SQL] IN operator should return NULL when comparing struct
with NULL fields
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Spark's IN operator behaves different from
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22006
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22006
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/94372/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22006
**[Test build #94372 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/94372/testReport)**
for PR 22006 at commit
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21932
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org
Github user dhruve commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22015
This modifies the SparkListenerUnpersistRDD case class, which fails the
MiMa tests. If this is something heavily used by developers, I can add either
another ListenerBus message or modify the PR to
Github user ueshin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21954#discussion_r208282941
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/higherOrderFunctions.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,166 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22027
LGTM
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user ueshin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21954#discussion_r208282971
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/resources/sql-tests/inputs/higher-order-functions.sql ---
@@ -0,0 +1,26 @@
+create or replace temporary view nested as
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21954#discussion_r208282782
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/higherOrderFunctions.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,166 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed
Github user ueshin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21954#discussion_r208282200
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/higherOrderFunctions.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,212 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed
Github user ueshin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21954#discussion_r208281900
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/higherOrderFunctions.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,212 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed
Github user mn-mikke commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22017#discussion_r208280351
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/higherOrderFunctions.scala
---
@@ -365,3 +364,101 @@ case class
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22028
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22028
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22028
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
GitHub user sddyljsx opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22028
[SPARK-25046][SQL] Fix Alter View can excute sql like "ALTER VIEW ... AS
INSERT INTO"
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Alter View can excute sql like "ALTER VIEW ...
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21954#discussion_r208277492
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/resources/sql-tests/inputs/higher-order-functions.sql ---
@@ -0,0 +1,26 @@
+create or replace temporary view nested as
Github user sujith71955 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20611
Updated the PR by fixing the comment from sean. Hope i addressed all the
issues :)
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21954#discussion_r208276367
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/higherOrderFunctions.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,166 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22027
**[Test build #94381 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/94381/testReport)**
for PR 22027 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22027
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22027
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user ueshin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22027
cc @viirya @cloud-fan
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
GitHub user ueshin opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22027
[SPARK-25010][SQL][FOLLOWUP] Shuffle should also produce different values
for each execution in streaming query.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This is a follow-up pr
Github user hvanhovell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21954#discussion_r208273712
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/higherOrderFunctions.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,166 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21954#discussion_r208272808
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/higherOrderFunctions.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,166 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21608#discussion_r208269963
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/DataSourceUtils.scala
---
@@ -49,4 +51,11 @@ object DataSourceUtils {
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22022
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/94369/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22022
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22022
**[Test build #94369 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/94369/testReport)**
for PR 22022 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22026
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21954#discussion_r208269300
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/higherOrderFunctions.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,212 @@
+/*
+ *
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22026
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21954#discussion_r208268129
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/higherOrderFunctions.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,212 @@
+/*
+ *
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22026
**[Test build #94380 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/94380/testReport)**
for PR 22026 at commit
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21954#discussion_r208267632
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/higherOrderFunctions.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,212 @@
+/*
+ *
GitHub user jiangxb1987 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22026
[SPARK-25045][CORE] Make `RDDBarrier.mapParititions` similar to
`RDD.mapPartitions`
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Signature of the function passed to
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21954#discussion_r208266333
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/higherOrderFunctions.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,212 @@
+/*
+ *
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21669
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21669
Kubernetes integration test status success
URL:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/testing-k8s-prb-make-spark-distribution-unified/1917/
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21669
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user xuanyuanking commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22017#discussion_r208260664
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/higherOrderFunctions.scala
---
@@ -365,3 +364,101 @@ case class
Github user xuanyuanking commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22017#discussion_r208257687
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/complexTypeExtractors.scala
---
@@ -267,22 +267,23 @@ case class
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21669
Kubernetes integration test starting
URL:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/testing-k8s-prb-make-spark-distribution-unified/1917/
---
301 - 400 of 683 matches
Mail list logo
