Github user dilipbiswal commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17185
Good idea @gatorsmile . Thanks !!
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands,
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17185
Let us discuss it in the JIRA
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-25121
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubsc
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17185
@skambha @dilipbiswal How about the hint resolution after supporting multi
part names?
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-
Github user felixcheung commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22109
@vanzin @squito
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22107
**[Test build #94789 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/94789/testReport)**
for PR 22107 at commit
[`1d93304`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/1d
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22107
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/testing-k8s-prb-make-spark-distribution-unified/2203/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22107
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional comma
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21123
This PR needs to be rebased once #22009 gets in.
> I think that PR should remove SaveMode and should always use the new
logical plans for v2 operations.
I don't agree according t
Github user maropu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17400
ok, thanks. I'll resume this work after the freeze.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additio
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22013
**[Test build #94788 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/94788/testReport)**
for PR 22013 at commit
[`e5d9b05`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/e5
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21451
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/94778/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21451
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional comma
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21537
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21451
**[Test build #94778 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/94778/testReport)**
for PR 21451 at commit
[`44149a5`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/4
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21537
Merged to master.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21537
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional comma
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21537
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/94782/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21537
**[Test build #94782 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/94782/testReport)**
for PR 21537 at commit
[`508e091`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/5
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17400
@maropu We should fix it. How about doing it after the code freeze? So far,
all are swamped by different tasks.
---
-
To uns
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20611
**[Test build #94787 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/94787/testReport)**
for PR 20611 at commit
[`5ad2d58`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/5a
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21146
**[Test build #4258 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/4258/testReport)**
for PR 21146 at commit
[`3ac1d63`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22009
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/94779/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22009
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional comma
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22009
**[Test build #94779 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/94779/testReport)**
for PR 22009 at commit
[`f4f85a8`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/f
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20226
**[Test build #94786 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/94786/testReport)**
for PR 20226 at commit
[`1facc05`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/1f
Github user yanlin-Lynn closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20529
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.or
Github user yanlin-Lynn commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20529
No Need any more, close this patch.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional command
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21889
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/94785/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21889
**[Test build #94785 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/94785/testReport)**
for PR 21889 at commit
[`1c0c4bf`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/1
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21889
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional comma
Github user ajacques commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21889#discussion_r210170646
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/parquet/ParquetSchemaPruningSuite.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,245 @@
+/*
+ *
Github user rednaxelafx commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22103#discussion_r210169785
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/codegen/CodeGenerator.scala
---
@@ -1385,9 +1386,15 @@ object CodeGener
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21889
**[Test build #94785 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/94785/testReport)**
for PR 21889 at commit
[`1c0c4bf`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/1c
Github user ueshin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22031
@techaddict Thanks! I look forward to the update.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additiona
Github user techaddict commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22031
Hi @ueshin I will update the PR tommorow
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional com
Github user ueshin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22031
Hi @techaddict,
Do you have time to continue working on this?
If you don't have enough time, I can take this over, so please let me know.
Thanks!
---
---
Github user deshanxiao commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22093
@xuanyuanking I think it carefully later. You are right. The UT just need
to guarantee the KryoSerializer right not all. I will add it in
`KryoSerializerSuite`. Should I delete current UT from Fi
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22099
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional comma
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22099
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/94776/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22099
**[Test build #94776 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/94776/testReport)**
for PR 22099 at commit
[`e79e5b9`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/e
Github user ueshin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22045#discussion_r210164955
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/higherOrderFunctions.scala
---
@@ -497,6 +497,60 @@ case class ArrayAggregat
Github user ueshin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22045#discussion_r210165194
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/HigherOrderFunctionsSuite.scala
---
@@ -95,6 +95,12 @@ class HigherOrderFunc
Github user ueshin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22045#discussion_r210165373
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/HigherOrderFunctionsSuite.scala
---
@@ -283,6 +289,61 @@ class HigherOrderFu
Github user ueshin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22045#discussion_r210165543
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/resources/sql-tests/inputs/higher-order-functions.sql ---
@@ -51,3 +51,17 @@ select exists(ys, y -> y > 30) as v from nested;
Github user ueshin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22045#discussion_r210164879
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/higherOrderFunctions.scala
---
@@ -497,6 +497,60 @@ case class ArrayAggregat
Github user ueshin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22045#discussion_r210164976
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/higherOrderFunctions.scala
---
@@ -497,6 +497,60 @@ case class ArrayAggregat
Github user ueshin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22045#discussion_r210165225
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/HigherOrderFunctionsSuite.scala
---
@@ -283,6 +289,61 @@ class HigherOrderFu
Github user ueshin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22045#discussion_r210165102
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/higherOrderFunctions.scala
---
@@ -497,6 +497,60 @@ case class ArrayAggregat
Github user ueshin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22045#discussion_r210165448
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/DataFrameFunctionsSuite.scala ---
@@ -2302,6 +2302,210 @@ class DataFrameFunctionsSuite extends QueryT
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21661
**[Test build #94784 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/94784/testReport)**
for PR 21661 at commit
[`34ca4ef`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/34
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21661
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/testing-k8s-prb-make-spark-distribution-unified/2202/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21661
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional comma
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21561
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/94781/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21561
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional comma
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21561
**[Test build #94781 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/94781/testReport)**
for PR 21561 at commit
[`ecab85c`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/e
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21661
retest this please
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: review
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22045
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional comma
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22045
**[Test build #94783 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/94783/testReport)**
for PR 22045 at commit
[`b73106d`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/b
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22045
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/94783/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22045
**[Test build #94783 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/94783/testReport)**
for PR 22045 at commit
[`b73106d`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/b7
Github user ueshin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22013#discussion_r210165079
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/higherOrderFunctions.scala
---
@@ -497,6 +497,65 @@ case class ArrayAggregat
Github user ueshin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22045
ok to test.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17086
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional comma
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17086
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/94780/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17086
**[Test build #94780 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/94780/testReport)**
for PR 17086 at commit
[`9e59fd5`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/9
Github user ueshin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22013
Btw, we need one more right parenthesis after the second `array(1, 2, 3)`
and a space at `(k,v)` in the description?
---
-
To uns
Github user deshanxiao commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22109
please help me cc @HyukjinKwon
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-m
Github user ueshin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22013#discussion_r210161746
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/DataFrameFunctionsSuite.scala ---
@@ -2302,6 +2302,97 @@ class DataFrameFunctionsSuite extends QueryTe
Github user ueshin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22013#discussion_r210161509
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/DataFrameFunctionsSuite.scala ---
@@ -2302,6 +2302,97 @@ class DataFrameFunctionsSuite extends QueryTe
Github user ueshin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22013#discussion_r210162791
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/HigherOrderFunctionsSuite.scala
---
@@ -283,6 +289,75 @@ class HigherOrderFu
Github user ueshin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22013#discussion_r210161936
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/DataFrameFunctionsSuite.scala ---
@@ -2302,6 +2302,97 @@ class DataFrameFunctionsSuite extends QueryTe
Github user ueshin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22013#discussion_r210162501
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/resources/sql-tests/inputs/higher-order-functions.sql ---
@@ -51,3 +51,17 @@ select exists(ys, y -> y > 30) as v from nested;
Github user ueshin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22013#discussion_r210161616
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/DataFrameFunctionsSuite.scala ---
@@ -2302,6 +2302,97 @@ class DataFrameFunctionsSuite extends QueryTe
Github user ueshin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22013#discussion_r210163358
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/DataFrameFunctionsSuite.scala ---
@@ -2302,6 +2302,97 @@ class DataFrameFunctionsSuite extends QueryTe
Github user ueshin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22013#discussion_r210160909
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/higherOrderFunctions.scala
---
@@ -497,6 +497,65 @@ case class ArrayAggregat
Github user ueshin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22013#discussion_r210159871
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/higherOrderFunctions.scala
---
@@ -497,6 +497,65 @@ case class ArrayAggregat
Github user ueshin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22013#discussion_r210160419
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/higherOrderFunctions.scala
---
@@ -497,6 +497,65 @@ case class ArrayAggregat
Github user ueshin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22013#discussion_r210160577
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/higherOrderFunctions.scala
---
@@ -497,6 +497,65 @@ case class ArrayAggregat
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21123
@gatorsmile Yea, it shouldn't break the compatibility for now for the
reasons described in the PR I guess.
@rdblue, however, strictly isn't that specific to Datasource V2, or did I
misu
Github user deshanxiao commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22093
@xuanyuanking Thanks for your suggestion. We could indeed test whether
`TaskCommitMessage` can be serialized by `KryoSerializer`. But We could not
explain why the framework must serialize `TaskCo
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22013
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/94775/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22013
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional comma
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22013
**[Test build #94775 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/94775/testReport)**
for PR 22013 at commit
[`5db526b`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/5
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22104
> we can implement a dummy data source v1/v2 at scala side
There's an example https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21007 that
implement something in Scala and use it in Python side test.
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22109
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21698
> ... assume that computation is idempotent - we do not support non
determinism in computation
Ah this is a reasonable restriction, we should document it in the RDD
classdoc. How about th
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21306
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/94773/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21306
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional comma
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21306
**[Test build #94773 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/94773/testReport)**
for PR 21306 at commit
[`21acda2`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/2
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22109
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22109
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
GitHub user deshanxiao opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22109
[SPARK-25120][CORE][HistoryServer]Fix the problem of EventLogListener may
miss driver SparkListenerBlocâ¦
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Sometimes in spark history
Github user sprintcheng commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17461
May I know when this change being included into official release, I
download spark 2.3.1 and still do NOT find this method(lda.setInitialModel) has
been added.
---
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21537
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/testing-k8s-prb-make-spark-distribution-unified/2201/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21561
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/testing-k8s-prb-make-spark-distribution-unified/2200/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21537
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional comma
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21561
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional comma
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21537
**[Test build #94782 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/94782/testReport)**
for PR 21537 at commit
[`508e091`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/50
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21561
**[Test build #94781 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/94781/testReport)**
for PR 21561 at commit
[`ecab85c`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/ec
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21537
retest this please
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: review
1 - 100 of 598 matches
Mail list logo
