AmplabJenkins commented on pull request #29881:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/29881#issuecomment-699589036
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to
AmplabJenkins removed a comment on pull request #29881:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/29881#issuecomment-699589036
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on
SparkQA commented on pull request #29881:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/29881#issuecomment-699589033
Kubernetes integration test status success
URL:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder-K8s/33757/
AmplabJenkins removed a comment on pull request #29881:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/29881#issuecomment-699588173
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on
SparkQA commented on pull request #29881:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/29881#issuecomment-699588171
Kubernetes integration test status success
URL:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder-K8s/33756/
AmplabJenkins commented on pull request #29881:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/29881#issuecomment-699588173
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to
SparkQA commented on pull request #29881:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/29881#issuecomment-699587803
Kubernetes integration test starting
URL:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder-K8s/33757/
SparkQA commented on pull request #29881:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/29881#issuecomment-699586571
Kubernetes integration test starting
URL:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder-K8s/33756/
SparkQA commented on pull request #29881:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/29881#issuecomment-699584677
**[Test build #129141 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/129141/testReport)**
for PR 29881 at commit
AmplabJenkins removed a comment on pull request #29881:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/29881#issuecomment-699583745
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
SparkQA commented on pull request #29881:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/29881#issuecomment-699583741
**[Test build #129140 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/129140/testReport)**
for PR 29881 at commit
SparkQA removed a comment on pull request #29881:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/29881#issuecomment-699583671
**[Test build #129140 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/129140/testReport)**
for PR 29881 at commit
AmplabJenkins commented on pull request #29881:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/29881#issuecomment-699583743
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to
AmplabJenkins removed a comment on pull request #29881:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/29881#issuecomment-699583743
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To
SparkQA commented on pull request #29881:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/29881#issuecomment-699583671
**[Test build #129140 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/129140/testReport)**
for PR 29881 at commit
AngersZh opened a new pull request #29881:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/29881
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Support `spark.sql.hive.metastore.jars` use HDFS location.
When user need to use path to set hive metastore jars, you should set
AngersZh commented on pull request #29881:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/29881#issuecomment-699583150
ping @wangyum
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please
AmplabJenkins commented on pull request #29880:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/29880#issuecomment-699582421
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to
AmplabJenkins removed a comment on pull request #29880:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/29880#issuecomment-699582421
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on
SparkQA removed a comment on pull request #29880:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/29880#issuecomment-699560269
**[Test build #129138 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/129138/testReport)**
for PR 29880 at commit
SparkQA commented on pull request #29880:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/29880#issuecomment-699582316
**[Test build #129138 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/129138/testReport)**
for PR 29880 at commit
AmplabJenkins removed a comment on pull request #29868:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/29868#issuecomment-699580312
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on
AmplabJenkins commented on pull request #29868:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/29868#issuecomment-699580312
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to
Tagar commented on pull request #29729:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/29729#issuecomment-699580277
@HeartSaVioR I concur - we have seen issues with hanging kafka consumers in
Spark Streaming applications. This would be great to fix.
SparkQA removed a comment on pull request #29868:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/29868#issuecomment-699574853
**[Test build #129139 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/129139/testReport)**
for PR 29868 at commit
SparkQA commented on pull request #29868:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/29868#issuecomment-699580244
**[Test build #129139 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/129139/testReport)**
for PR 29868 at commit
AmplabJenkins commented on pull request #29868:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/29868#issuecomment-699579897
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to
AmplabJenkins removed a comment on pull request #29868:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/29868#issuecomment-699579897
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on
SparkQA commented on pull request #29868:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/29868#issuecomment-699579896
Kubernetes integration test status success
URL:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder-K8s/33755/
nssalian commented on pull request #29877:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/29877#issuecomment-699579277
> Can we have java doc here?
There's no javadoc in the original PR
(https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/24748). This is simply a backport. Any
improvements can follow
SparkQA commented on pull request #29868:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/29868#issuecomment-699578609
Kubernetes integration test starting
URL:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder-K8s/33755/
LuciferYang commented on pull request #29857:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/29857#issuecomment-699576181
From the first round of code checking, may be this is the last module to fix
Scala version compatibility
LuciferYang edited a comment on pull request #29871:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/29871#issuecomment-699574633
If there are multiple candidate plans with same cost, I think `different
inputs produce different outputs` is reasonableļ¼so only need ensure the same
behavior in
SparkQA commented on pull request #29868:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/29868#issuecomment-699574853
**[Test build #129139 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/129139/testReport)**
for PR 29868 at commit
LuciferYang commented on pull request #29871:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/29871#issuecomment-699574633
If there are multiple candidate plans with the same cost, I think `different
inputs produce different outputs` is reasonableļ¼so only need ensure the same
behavior in Scala
viirya commented on pull request #29868:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/29868#issuecomment-699573214
Yeah, sounds good to me. Maybe also mention a warning will be shown?
This is an automated message from the
zhengruifeng edited a comment on pull request #29868:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/29868#issuecomment-699571847
> This is still 'required' right?
yes. This algorithm was designed to have this requirement. But I guess
`must` may suggest an exception/error, so what about
AngersZh commented on a change in pull request #29054:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/29054#discussion_r495515099
##
File path:
sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/HiveSessionCatalog.scala
##
@@ -69,7 +69,14 @@ private[sql] class
zhengruifeng commented on pull request #29868:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/29868#issuecomment-699571847
> This is still 'required' right?
yes. This algorithm was designed to have this requirement. But I guess
`must` may suggest an exception/error, so what about
LuciferYang edited a comment on pull request #29857:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/29857#issuecomment-699571003
@srowen Is there any other problem in this pr that needs to be fixed?thx ~
This is an automated
LuciferYang commented on pull request #29857:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/29857#issuecomment-699571003
@srowen Is there any other problem in this pr that needs to be fixed?
This is an automated message from the
zhengruifeng commented on pull request #29850:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/29850#issuecomment-699570531
Merged to master. Thanks @MLnick @srowen @huaxingao for reviewing!
This is an automated message from the
zhengruifeng closed pull request #29850:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/29850
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to
zhengruifeng commented on pull request #29852:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/29852#issuecomment-699570008
Thanks @srowen and @huaxingao for help reviewing
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
github-actions[bot] closed pull request #28778:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/28778
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL
AmplabJenkins removed a comment on pull request #29880:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/29880#issuecomment-699565422
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
SparkQA commented on pull request #29880:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/29880#issuecomment-699565417
Kubernetes integration test status failure
URL:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder-K8s/33754/
AmplabJenkins commented on pull request #29880:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/29880#issuecomment-699565420
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to
AmplabJenkins removed a comment on pull request #29880:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/29880#issuecomment-699565420
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To
SparkQA commented on pull request #29880:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/29880#issuecomment-699563439
Kubernetes integration test starting
URL:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder-K8s/33754/
AmplabJenkins commented on pull request #29875:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/29875#issuecomment-699563137
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to
AmplabJenkins removed a comment on pull request #29875:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/29875#issuecomment-699563137
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on
SparkQA removed a comment on pull request #29875:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/29875#issuecomment-699538332
**[Test build #129135 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/129135/testReport)**
for PR 29875 at commit
SparkQA commented on pull request #29875:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/29875#issuecomment-699562968
**[Test build #129135 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/129135/testReport)**
for PR 29875 at commit
SparkQA commented on pull request #29880:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/29880#issuecomment-699560269
**[Test build #129138 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/129138/testReport)**
for PR 29880 at commit
imback82 commented on a change in pull request #29880:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/29880#discussion_r495505316
##
File path:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/connector/DataSourceV2SQLSuite.scala
##
@@ -168,7 +168,31 @@ class DataSourceV2SQLSuite
SparkQA commented on pull request #29879:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/29879#issuecomment-699559967
Kubernetes integration test status success
URL:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder-K8s/33753/
AmplabJenkins removed a comment on pull request #29879:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/29879#issuecomment-699559970
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on
AmplabJenkins commented on pull request #29879:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/29879#issuecomment-699559970
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to
imback82 opened a new pull request #29880:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/29880
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR proposes to migrate `DESCRIBE tbl colname` to use
`UnresolvedTableOrView` to resolve the table/view identifier. This allows
dongjoon-hyun commented on pull request #29875:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/29875#issuecomment-699559351
Hi, @rednaxelafx . Could you make a backport to branch-2.4?
This is an automated message from the Apache
dongjoon-hyun closed pull request #29875:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/29875
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to
SparkQA commented on pull request #29879:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/29879#issuecomment-699558867
Kubernetes integration test starting
URL:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder-K8s/33753/
gemelen edited a comment on pull request #29286:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/29286#issuecomment-699543632
@srowen yes, it's in Scaladoc/doc part of documentation generation task (and
not StackOverflowException). Yes, it's probably classpath issue, since with
different set of
AmplabJenkins removed a comment on pull request #29879:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/29879#issuecomment-699557700
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on
AmplabJenkins commented on pull request #29879:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/29879#issuecomment-699557700
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to
SparkQA commented on pull request #29879:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/29879#issuecomment-699557647
**[Test build #129137 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/129137/testReport)**
for PR 29879 at commit
SparkQA removed a comment on pull request #29879:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/29879#issuecomment-699555766
**[Test build #129137 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/129137/testReport)**
for PR 29879 at commit
SparkQA commented on pull request #29879:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/29879#issuecomment-699555766
**[Test build #129137 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/129137/testReport)**
for PR 29879 at commit
zero323 opened a new pull request #29879:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/29879
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
### Why are the changes needed?
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
### How
AmplabJenkins removed a comment on pull request #29878:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/29878#issuecomment-699548094
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on
AmplabJenkins commented on pull request #29878:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/29878#issuecomment-699548094
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to
SparkQA commented on pull request #29878:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/29878#issuecomment-699548091
Kubernetes integration test status success
URL:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder-K8s/33752/
SparkQA commented on pull request #29878:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/29878#issuecomment-699546546
Kubernetes integration test starting
URL:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder-K8s/33752/
AmplabJenkins removed a comment on pull request #29875:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/29875#issuecomment-699545561
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on
AmplabJenkins commented on pull request #29875:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/29875#issuecomment-699545561
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to
SparkQA commented on pull request #29875:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/29875#issuecomment-699545558
Kubernetes integration test status success
URL:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder-K8s/33751/
AmplabJenkins removed a comment on pull request #29878:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/29878#issuecomment-699544986
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on
AmplabJenkins commented on pull request #29878:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/29878#issuecomment-699544986
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to
SparkQA commented on pull request #29878:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/29878#issuecomment-699544918
**[Test build #129136 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/129136/testReport)**
for PR 29878 at commit
SparkQA removed a comment on pull request #29878:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/29878#issuecomment-699542375
**[Test build #129136 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/129136/testReport)**
for PR 29878 at commit
gemelen edited a comment on pull request #29286:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/29286#issuecomment-699543632
@srowen yes, it's in Scaladoc/doc part of documentation generation task (and
not StackOverflowException). Yes, it's probably classpath issue, since with
different set of
gemelen commented on pull request #29286:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/29286#issuecomment-699543632
@srowen yes, it's in Scaladoc/doc part of documentation generation task (and
not StackOverflowException). Yes, it's probably classpath issue, since with
different set of
SparkQA commented on pull request #29875:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/29875#issuecomment-699543400
Kubernetes integration test starting
URL:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder-K8s/33751/
SparkQA commented on pull request #29878:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/29878#issuecomment-699542375
**[Test build #129136 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/129136/testReport)**
for PR 29878 at commit
zero323 commented on pull request #29878:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/29878#issuecomment-699542233
cc @HyukjinKwon
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please
zero323 opened a new pull request #29878:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/29878
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR adds two `type: ignores`, one in `pyspark.install` and one in
related tests.
### Why are the changes needed?
srowen commented on pull request #29286:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/29286#issuecomment-699541340
I'm kind of catching up here, but it looks like Github PR builder test
failures currently have to do with scaladoc build not understanding the
classpath in the same way? not a
zero323 commented on a change in pull request #29180:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/29180#discussion_r495487007
##
File path: dev/lint-python
##
@@ -122,6 +123,31 @@ function pycodestyle_test {
fi
}
+function mypy_test {
+local MYPY_REPORT=
+local
viirya commented on a change in pull request #29024:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/29024#discussion_r495488559
##
File path:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/jdbc/connection/ConnectionProvider.scala
##
@@ -18,60 +18,41 @@
package
SparkQA commented on pull request #29875:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/29875#issuecomment-699538332
**[Test build #129135 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/129135/testReport)**
for PR 29875 at commit
viirya commented on pull request #29875:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/29875#issuecomment-699537905
retest this please
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please
AmplabJenkins commented on pull request #29286:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/29286#issuecomment-699515462
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to
AmplabJenkins removed a comment on pull request #29286:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/29286#issuecomment-699515462
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on
SparkQA commented on pull request #29286:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/29286#issuecomment-699515223
**[Test build #129134 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/129134/testReport)**
for PR 29286 at commit
SparkQA removed a comment on pull request #29286:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/29286#issuecomment-699494751
**[Test build #129134 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/129134/testReport)**
for PR 29286 at commit
AmplabJenkins commented on pull request #29054:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/29054#issuecomment-699509613
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to
AmplabJenkins removed a comment on pull request #29054:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/29054#issuecomment-699509613
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on
SparkQA commented on pull request #29054:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/29054#issuecomment-699509362
**[Test build #129133 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/129133/testReport)**
for PR 29054 at commit
SparkQA removed a comment on pull request #29054:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/29054#issuecomment-699478815
**[Test build #129133 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/129133/testReport)**
for PR 29054 at commit
1 - 100 of 139 matches
Mail list logo
