Github user cowtowncoder commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12766#issuecomment-215876639
@JoshRosen yes, thank you for following up on this!
On compatibility: there were some issues with 2.7.0 - 2.7.2, regarding type
resolution, most of which
Github user cowtowncoder commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12213#issuecomment-206672520
@JoshRosen probably makes sense, but just in case it needs to be revisited
Jackson's core databind has much more support for "referential types" (
Github user cowtowncoder commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12213#issuecomment-206566391
@JoshRosen ah. Yes, good point on usage via json4s.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
Github user cowtowncoder commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12213#issuecomment-206555763
I don't know enough about Spark internals to know if this makes sense, but
there is a smaller alternative databinding, Jackson jr:
https://githu
Github user cowtowncoder commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10256#issuecomment-176310354
@srowen Ah. Yes, just wanted to mention it; I don't have enough context so
there may be specific reasons for picking up particular versions. Glad to see
ve
Github user cowtowncoder commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10256#issuecomment-176300804
I know this issue is closed, but one suggestion I have would be to specify
the latest Jackson 2.5 version, 2.5.5 instead of 2.5.3. While I understand
caution in
