Github user linbojin closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16276
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
Github user linbojin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16276
@rxin Thx, I just deep dive into spark, I hope i can try to contribute more
impactful things later ð . I will close this one. @srowen I tried out your
idea that i created
Github user linbojin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16276
@srowen So any problems with my current implementation, i mean use
`implicit asTraversable: T => TraversableOnce[U]`. Because I refer to `flatten`
implementation in scala source code:
ht
Github user linbojin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16276#discussion_r92550699
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/rdd/RDD.scala ---
@@ -381,6 +381,14 @@ abstract class RDD[T: ClassTag
Github user linbojin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16276#discussion_r92546374
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/rdd/RDD.scala ---
@@ -381,6 +381,14 @@ abstract class RDD[T: ClassTag
Github user linbojin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16276#discussion_r92531327
--- Diff: core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/rdd/RDDSuite.scala ---
@@ -88,6 +88,13 @@ class RDDSuite extends SparkFunSuite with
SharedSparkContext
Github user linbojin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16276
cc @rxin
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so
GitHub user linbojin opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16276
[SPARK-18855][CORE] Add RDD flatten function
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Added a new flatten function for RDD.
## How was this patch tested?
Unit
GitHub user linbojin opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16132
[MINOR] [README] Correct Markdown link inside readme
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
"Useful Developer Tools" link inside
[README.md](https://github.com/ap
Github user linbojin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14645#discussion_r74737989
--- Diff: docs/quick-start.md ---
@@ -40,7 +40,7 @@ RDDs have _[actions](programming-guide.html#actions)_,
which return values, and
{% highlight
Github user linbojin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14645#discussion_r74737117
--- Diff: docs/quick-start.md ---
@@ -40,7 +40,7 @@ RDDs have _[actions](programming-guide.html#actions)_,
which return values, and
{% highlight
Github user linbojin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14645#discussion_r74733368
--- Diff: docs/quick-start.md ---
@@ -40,7 +40,7 @@ RDDs have _[actions](programming-guide.html#actions)_,
which return values, and
{% highlight
GitHub user linbojin opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14645
[MINOR] [DOC] Correct code snippet results in quick start documentation
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
As README.md file is updated over time. Some code snippet
Github user linbojin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13087#issuecomment-221148743
@marmbrus @dongjoon-hyun I will add the detail description to the old
SPARK-15282 JIRA issue.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email
Github user linbojin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13087#issuecomment-220837854
@dongjoon-hyun @cloud-fan @marmbrus Thanks for your discussions about my
reported issue: [SPARK-15282](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-15282
Github user linbojin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13087#issuecomment-220502400
Hi, @marmbrus
Could you review this PR?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
16 matches
Mail list logo