[GitHub] [spark] AmplabJenkins removed a comment on pull request #28988: [SPARK-32163][SQL] Nested pruning should work even with cosmetic variations

AmplabJenkins removed a comment on pull request #28988: URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/28988#issuecomment-655185232 This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on

[GitHub] [spark] AmplabJenkins removed a comment on pull request #28988: [SPARK-32163][SQL] Nested pruning should work even with cosmetic variations

AmplabJenkins removed a comment on pull request #28988: URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/28988#issuecomment-654953053 This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on

[GitHub] [spark] AmplabJenkins removed a comment on pull request #28988: [SPARK-32163][SQL] Nested pruning should work even with cosmetic variations

AmplabJenkins removed a comment on pull request #28988: URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/28988#issuecomment-654911043 This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on

[GitHub] [spark] AmplabJenkins removed a comment on pull request #28988: [SPARK-32163][SQL] Nested pruning should work even with cosmetic variations

AmplabJenkins removed a comment on pull request #28988: URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/28988#issuecomment-654669416 This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on

[GitHub] [spark] AmplabJenkins removed a comment on pull request #28988: [SPARK-32163][SQL] Nested pruning should work even with cosmetic variations

AmplabJenkins removed a comment on pull request #28988: URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/28988#issuecomment-654645086 Test FAILed. Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed): https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/125

[GitHub] [spark] AmplabJenkins removed a comment on pull request #28988: [SPARK-32163][SQL] Nested pruning should work even with cosmetic variations

AmplabJenkins removed a comment on pull request #28988: URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/28988#issuecomment-654645080 Merged build finished. Test FAILed. This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To r

[GitHub] [spark] AmplabJenkins removed a comment on pull request #28988: [SPARK-32163][SQL] Nested pruning should work even with cosmetic variations

AmplabJenkins removed a comment on pull request #28988: URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/28988#issuecomment-654570176 This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on

[GitHub] [spark] AmplabJenkins removed a comment on pull request #28988: [SPARK-32163][SQL] Nested pruning should work even with cosmetic variations

AmplabJenkins removed a comment on pull request #28988: URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/28988#issuecomment-654565644 Test FAILed. Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed): https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/125

[GitHub] [spark] AmplabJenkins removed a comment on pull request #28988: [SPARK-32163][SQL] Nested pruning should work even with cosmetic variations

AmplabJenkins removed a comment on pull request #28988: URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/28988#issuecomment-654565636 Merged build finished. Test FAILed. This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To r

[GitHub] [spark] AmplabJenkins removed a comment on pull request #28988: [SPARK-32163][SQL] Nested pruning should work even with cosmetic variations

AmplabJenkins removed a comment on pull request #28988: URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/28988#issuecomment-654558328 This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on

[GitHub] [spark] AmplabJenkins removed a comment on pull request #28988: [SPARK-32163][SQL] Nested pruning should work even with cosmetic variations

AmplabJenkins removed a comment on pull request #28988: URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/28988#issuecomment-654553778 Test FAILed. Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed): https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/125

[GitHub] [spark] AmplabJenkins removed a comment on pull request #28988: [SPARK-32163][SQL] Nested pruning should work even with cosmetic variations

AmplabJenkins removed a comment on pull request #28988: URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/28988#issuecomment-654553774 Merged build finished. Test FAILed. This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To r

[GitHub] [spark] AmplabJenkins removed a comment on pull request #28988: [SPARK-32163][SQL] Nested pruning should work even with cosmetic variations

AmplabJenkins removed a comment on pull request #28988: URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/28988#issuecomment-654512651 This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on

[GitHub] [spark] AmplabJenkins removed a comment on pull request #28988: [SPARK-32163][SQL] Nested pruning should work even with cosmetic variations

AmplabJenkins removed a comment on pull request #28988: URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/28988#issuecomment-654509597 Test FAILed. Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed): https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/125

[GitHub] [spark] AmplabJenkins removed a comment on pull request #28988: [SPARK-32163][SQL] Nested pruning should work even with cosmetic variations

AmplabJenkins removed a comment on pull request #28988: URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/28988#issuecomment-654509593 Merged build finished. Test FAILed. This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To r

[GitHub] [spark] AmplabJenkins removed a comment on pull request #28988: [SPARK-32163][SQL] Nested pruning should work even with cosmetic variations

AmplabJenkins removed a comment on pull request #28988: URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/28988#issuecomment-654285726 This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on

[GitHub] [spark] AmplabJenkins removed a comment on pull request #28988: [SPARK-32163][SQL] Nested pruning should work even with cosmetic variations

AmplabJenkins removed a comment on pull request #28988: URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/28988#issuecomment-654281675 Test FAILed. Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed): https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/125

[GitHub] [spark] AmplabJenkins removed a comment on pull request #28988: [SPARK-32163][SQL] Nested pruning should work even with cosmetic variations

AmplabJenkins removed a comment on pull request #28988: URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/28988#issuecomment-654281650 Merged build finished. Test FAILed. This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To r

[GitHub] [spark] AmplabJenkins removed a comment on pull request #28988: [SPARK-32163][SQL] Nested pruning should work even with cosmetic variations

AmplabJenkins removed a comment on pull request #28988: URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/28988#issuecomment-654059839 This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on

[GitHub] [spark] AmplabJenkins removed a comment on pull request #28988: [SPARK-32163][SQL] Nested pruning should work even with cosmetic variations

AmplabJenkins removed a comment on pull request #28988: URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/28988#issuecomment-654054483 Test FAILed. Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed): https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/125

[GitHub] [spark] AmplabJenkins removed a comment on pull request #28988: [SPARK-32163][SQL] Nested pruning should work even with cosmetic variations

AmplabJenkins removed a comment on pull request #28988: URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/28988#issuecomment-654054472 Merged build finished. Test FAILed. This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To r

[GitHub] [spark] AmplabJenkins removed a comment on pull request #28988: [SPARK-32163][SQL] Nested pruning should work even with cosmetic variations

AmplabJenkins removed a comment on pull request #28988: URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/28988#issuecomment-654044986 This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on

[GitHub] [spark] AmplabJenkins removed a comment on pull request #28988: [SPARK-32163][SQL] Nested pruning should work even with cosmetic variations

AmplabJenkins removed a comment on pull request #28988: URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/28988#issuecomment-654043312 Test FAILed. Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed): https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/124

[GitHub] [spark] AmplabJenkins removed a comment on pull request #28988: [SPARK-32163][SQL] Nested pruning should work even with cosmetic variations

AmplabJenkins removed a comment on pull request #28988: URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/28988#issuecomment-654043310 Merged build finished. Test FAILed. This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To r

[GitHub] [spark] AmplabJenkins removed a comment on pull request #28988: [SPARK-32163][SQL] Nested pruning should work even with cosmetic variations

AmplabJenkins removed a comment on pull request #28988: URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/28988#issuecomment-653966450 Test FAILed. Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed): https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/124

[GitHub] [spark] AmplabJenkins removed a comment on pull request #28988: [SPARK-32163][SQL] Nested pruning should work even with cosmetic variations

AmplabJenkins removed a comment on pull request #28988: URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/28988#issuecomment-653966654 This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on

[GitHub] [spark] AmplabJenkins removed a comment on pull request #28988: [SPARK-32163][SQL] Nested pruning should work even with cosmetic variations

AmplabJenkins removed a comment on pull request #28988: URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/28988#issuecomment-653966445 Merged build finished. Test FAILed. This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To r

[GitHub] [spark] AmplabJenkins removed a comment on pull request #28988: [SPARK-32163][SQL] Nested pruning should work even with cosmetic variations

AmplabJenkins removed a comment on pull request #28988: URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/28988#issuecomment-653932145 This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on