AngersZh commented on pull request #30243:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/30243#issuecomment-736989381
retest this please
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, ple
AngersZh commented on pull request #30243:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/30243#issuecomment-736156071
retest this please
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, ple
AngersZh commented on pull request #30243:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/30243#issuecomment-735883750
PR desc updated and add more UT
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the
AngersZh commented on pull request #30243:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/30243#issuecomment-735399362
retest this please
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, ple
AngersZh commented on pull request #30243:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/30243#issuecomment-732948270
Any update?
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log
AngersZh commented on pull request #30243:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/30243#issuecomment-731198109
> Just out of curiosity ‒ cannot the proposed use case be addressed with
>
> ```
> array_intersect(right, left) = right
> ```
>
> ?
Computational e
AngersZh commented on pull request #30243:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/30243#issuecomment-731195432
> Could you please add more complex test cases using `ArrayType(BinaryType)`
in addition to `ArrayType(IntegerType)`?
>
> And, could you please add test cases regardi
AngersZh commented on pull request #30243:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/30243#issuecomment-729446492
> When I only read the first description, the behavior is unknown regarding
what `contains_array` mean like the following cases
>
> * `array_contains_array(array(1, 2
AngersZh commented on pull request #30243:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/30243#issuecomment-729400441
> @AngersZh, do you know if other DBMSes support this expressions?
PostgresSQL support `@>` and `<@`
https://www.postgresql.org/docs/12/functions-array.html
AngersZh commented on pull request #30243:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/30243#issuecomment-729330960
gentle ping @maropu @cloud-fan @HyukjinKwon
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To r
AngersZh commented on pull request #30243:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/30243#issuecomment-722892310
> Probably, `arrays_contains(array(1, 2, 3), 2) AND arrays_contains(array(1,
2, 3), 3) `?
First, if `arrays_contains_array(array(1, 2, 3, ), array(1, 2, 3, 4,
AngersZh commented on pull request #30243:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/30243#issuecomment-722875681
> arrays_overlap(array(1, 2, 3), array(2, 3))?
ArrayOverlap checks if the two arrays contain at least one common element.
> Anyway, I think you need to describ
AngersZh commented on pull request #30243:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/30243#issuecomment-722827762
> > ```
> > > SELECT _FUNC_(array(1, 2, 3), array(2));
> > ```
>
> Why we need this func (e.g.,. other systems support this func)? Seems like
the example abol
AngersZh commented on pull request #30243:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/30243#issuecomment-721741351
retest this please
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, ple
14 matches
Mail list logo
