AngersZh commented on pull request #31010:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/31010#issuecomment-812619104
> Could you add the screenshot of the generated doc in the PR description?
Done
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the messa
AngersZh commented on pull request #31010:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/31010#issuecomment-811753198
ping @maropu
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific c
AngersZh commented on pull request #31010:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/31010#issuecomment-810814163
> `branch-3.0`/`3.1` does not have a doc for a TRANSFORM clause, so IMO it
would be nice to write the common syntaxes of a TRANSFORM clause in this first
PR and backport th
AngersZh commented on pull request #31010:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/31010#issuecomment-810007075
> Any update?
Should we wait for these two ?
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/29087
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/30957
--
This is an automated mes
AngersZh commented on pull request #31010:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/31010#issuecomment-753912003
Important issue is going now:
[Spark can’t support TRANSFORM with
aggregation](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-28227)
[Support processing array/map/st
AngersZh commented on pull request #31010:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/31010#issuecomment-753909432
FYI @maropu @HyukjinKwon @cloud-fan
Since a lot issue about TRANSFORM is done and some pr are still being
reviewed. Here is a framework about `TRANSFORM`'s doc, I will f
