HeartSaVioR commented on a change in pull request #30221:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/30221#discussion_r515822838



##########
File path: 
external/avro/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/avro/AvroUtils.scala
##########
@@ -171,9 +171,15 @@ private[sql] object AvroUtils extends Logging {
     protected val stopPosition: Long
 
     private[this] var completed = false
+    private[this] var interveningNext = true
+    private[this] var prevHasNextRow = false
     private[this] var currentRow: Option[InternalRow] = None
 
     def hasNextRow: Boolean = {
+      if (!interveningNext) {
+        // until a row is consumed, return previous result of hasNextRow
+        return prevHasNextRow
+      }

Review comment:
       I also feel @viirya 's suggestion would be simpler.
   
   In addition, looks like the implementation didn't respect the Iterator's 
contracts - calling `hasNextRow` shouldn't be prerequisite to call `nextRow`.
   
   Below code would fix the original issue (as this code passes the new test), 
as well as it would also work for the case only `nextRow` is called with 
handling NoSuchElementException.
   
   ```
   def hasNextRow: Boolean = {
         if (currentRow.isDefined) {
           return true
         }
   
         while (!completed && currentRow.isEmpty) {
           val r = fileReader.hasNext && !fileReader.pastSync(stopPosition)
           if (!r) {
             fileReader.close()
             completed = true
             currentRow = None
           } else {
             val record = fileReader.next()
             currentRow = 
deserializer.deserialize(record).asInstanceOf[Option[InternalRow]]
           }
         }
   
         currentRow.isDefined
       }
   
       def nextRow: InternalRow = {
         if (currentRow.isEmpty) {
           if (!hasNextRow) {
             throw new NoSuchElementException("next on empty iterator")
           }
         }
   
         val row = currentRow.get
         currentRow = None
         row
       }
   ```
   

##########
File path: 
external/avro/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/avro/AvroUtils.scala
##########
@@ -171,9 +171,15 @@ private[sql] object AvroUtils extends Logging {
     protected val stopPosition: Long
 
     private[this] var completed = false
+    private[this] var interveningNext = true
+    private[this] var prevHasNextRow = false
     private[this] var currentRow: Option[InternalRow] = None
 
     def hasNextRow: Boolean = {
+      if (!interveningNext) {
+        // until a row is consumed, return previous result of hasNextRow
+        return prevHasNextRow
+      }

Review comment:
       I also feel @viirya 's suggestion would be simpler.
   
   In addition, looks like the implementation didn't respect the Iterator's 
contracts - calling `hasNextRow` shouldn't be prerequisite to call `nextRow`.
   
   Below code would fix the original issue (as this code passes the new test), 
as well as it would also work for the case only `nextRow` is called with 
handling NoSuchElementException.
   
   ```
       def hasNextRow: Boolean = {
         if (currentRow.isDefined) {
           return true
         }
   
         while (!completed && currentRow.isEmpty) {
           val r = fileReader.hasNext && !fileReader.pastSync(stopPosition)
           if (!r) {
             fileReader.close()
             completed = true
             currentRow = None
           } else {
             val record = fileReader.next()
             currentRow = 
deserializer.deserialize(record).asInstanceOf[Option[InternalRow]]
           }
         }
   
         currentRow.isDefined
       }
   
       def nextRow: InternalRow = {
         if (currentRow.isEmpty) {
           if (!hasNextRow) {
             throw new NoSuchElementException("next on empty iterator")
           }
         }
   
         val row = currentRow.get
         currentRow = None
         row
       }
   ```
   

##########
File path: 
external/avro/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/avro/AvroUtils.scala
##########
@@ -171,9 +171,15 @@ private[sql] object AvroUtils extends Logging {
     protected val stopPosition: Long
 
     private[this] var completed = false
+    private[this] var interveningNext = true
+    private[this] var prevHasNextRow = false
     private[this] var currentRow: Option[InternalRow] = None
 
     def hasNextRow: Boolean = {
+      if (!interveningNext) {
+        // until a row is consumed, return previous result of hasNextRow
+        return prevHasNextRow
+      }

Review comment:
       I also feel @viirya 's suggestion would be simpler.
   
   In addition, looks like the implementation didn't respect the Iterator's 
contracts - calling `hasNextRow` shouldn't be prerequisite to call `nextRow`.
   
   Below code would fix the original issue (as this code passes the new test), 
as well as it would also work for the case which only calls `nextRow` with 
handling `NoSuchElementException`.
   
   ```
       def hasNextRow: Boolean = {
         if (currentRow.isDefined) {
           return true
         }
   
         while (!completed && currentRow.isEmpty) {
           val r = fileReader.hasNext && !fileReader.pastSync(stopPosition)
           if (!r) {
             fileReader.close()
             completed = true
             currentRow = None
           } else {
             val record = fileReader.next()
             currentRow = 
deserializer.deserialize(record).asInstanceOf[Option[InternalRow]]
           }
         }
   
         currentRow.isDefined
       }
   
       def nextRow: InternalRow = {
         if (currentRow.isEmpty) {
           if (!hasNextRow) {
             throw new NoSuchElementException("next on empty iterator")
           }
         }
   
         val row = currentRow.get
         currentRow = None
         row
       }
   ```
   

##########
File path: 
external/avro/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/avro/AvroUtils.scala
##########
@@ -171,9 +171,15 @@ private[sql] object AvroUtils extends Logging {
     protected val stopPosition: Long
 
     private[this] var completed = false
+    private[this] var interveningNext = true
+    private[this] var prevHasNextRow = false
     private[this] var currentRow: Option[InternalRow] = None
 
     def hasNextRow: Boolean = {
+      if (!interveningNext) {
+        // until a row is consumed, return previous result of hasNextRow
+        return prevHasNextRow
+      }

Review comment:
       I also feel @viirya 's suggestion would be simpler.
   
   In addition, looks like the implementation didn't respect the Iterator's 
contracts - calling `hasNextRow` explicitly shouldn't be prerequisite to call 
`nextRow`.
   
   Below code would fix the original issue (as this code passes the new test), 
as well as it would also work for the case which only calls `nextRow` with 
handling `NoSuchElementException`.
   
   ```
       def hasNextRow: Boolean = {
         if (currentRow.isDefined) {
           return true
         }
   
         while (!completed && currentRow.isEmpty) {
           val r = fileReader.hasNext && !fileReader.pastSync(stopPosition)
           if (!r) {
             fileReader.close()
             completed = true
             currentRow = None
           } else {
             val record = fileReader.next()
             currentRow = 
deserializer.deserialize(record).asInstanceOf[Option[InternalRow]]
           }
         }
   
         currentRow.isDefined
       }
   
       def nextRow: InternalRow = {
         if (currentRow.isEmpty) {
           if (!hasNextRow) {
             throw new NoSuchElementException("next on empty iterator")
           }
         }
   
         val row = currentRow.get
         currentRow = None
         row
       }
   ```
   

##########
File path: 
external/avro/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/avro/AvroUtils.scala
##########
@@ -171,9 +171,15 @@ private[sql] object AvroUtils extends Logging {
     protected val stopPosition: Long
 
     private[this] var completed = false
+    private[this] var interveningNext = true
+    private[this] var prevHasNextRow = false
     private[this] var currentRow: Option[InternalRow] = None
 
     def hasNextRow: Boolean = {
+      if (!interveningNext) {
+        // until a row is consumed, return previous result of hasNextRow
+        return prevHasNextRow
+      }

Review comment:
       I also feel @viirya 's suggestion would be simpler.
   
   In addition, looks like the implementation didn't respect the Iterator's 
contracts - calling `hasNextRow` explicitly shouldn't be prerequisite to call 
`nextRow`.
   
   Below code would fix the original issue (as this code passes the new test), 
as well as it would also work for the case which only calls `nextRow` with 
handling `NoSuchElementException`.
   
   ```
       def hasNextRow: Boolean = {
         while (!completed && currentRow.isEmpty) {
           val r = fileReader.hasNext && !fileReader.pastSync(stopPosition)
           if (!r) {
             fileReader.close()
             completed = true
             currentRow = None
           } else {
             val record = fileReader.next()
             currentRow = 
deserializer.deserialize(record).asInstanceOf[Option[InternalRow]]
           }
         }
   
         currentRow.isDefined
       }
   
       def nextRow: InternalRow = {
         if (currentRow.isEmpty) {
           if (!hasNextRow) {
             throw new NoSuchElementException("next on empty iterator")
           }
         }
   
         val row = currentRow.get
         currentRow = None
         row
       }
   ```
   




----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org

Reply via email to