HeartSaVioR commented on pull request #33085:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/33085#issuecomment-868896779
Thanks, merging to master!
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to th
HeartSaVioR commented on pull request #33085:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/33085#issuecomment-868883808
GA build passed for Scala 2.13 build, and style check with new rule is now
passed.
@srowen Would it be good to go?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache G
HeartSaVioR commented on pull request #33085:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/33085#issuecomment-868533548
Rebased to contain #33084 , and fixed one missed spot in this PR. style
check should pass now.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to t
HeartSaVioR commented on pull request #33085:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/33085#issuecomment-868489092
No, just two lines for now as the style check caught above in PR
description. #33084 will handle the fix.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To r
HeartSaVioR commented on pull request #33085:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/33085#issuecomment-868475050
cc. @srowen as I see he had been taking care of Scala things.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHu
HeartSaVioR commented on pull request #33085:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/33085#issuecomment-868464382
Build is failing by intention.
https://github.com/HeartSaVioR/spark/runs/2913871777?check_suite_focus=true
It reports scalastyle failure on master branch:
