HeartSaVioR edited a comment on pull request #30167:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/30167#issuecomment-717716130
Isn't it declared as "incorrect" behavior in discussion thread in dev.
mailing list? If that's not a bug what exactly we fix for master branch? I
think it's a kind of
HeartSaVioR edited a comment on pull request #30167:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/30167#issuecomment-718273215
Whether previous behavior is making sense or not looks to be a major
argument; I think silently ignoring the user's intention never makes sense.
Setting the config re
HeartSaVioR edited a comment on pull request #30167:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/30167#issuecomment-718273215
Whether previous behavior is making sense or not looks to be a major
argument; I think silently ignoring the user's intention never makes sense.
Setting the config re
HeartSaVioR edited a comment on pull request #30167:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/30167#issuecomment-718331516
If the pattern is normal in Spark codebase I think we should revisit - if
users configure something (A) and Spark decides to fail back (B), it must be
only case where
HeartSaVioR edited a comment on pull request #30167:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/30167#issuecomment-718331516
Additionally, if the pattern is normal in Spark codebase I think we should
revisit - if users configure something (A) and Spark decides to fail back (B),
it must be o
HeartSaVioR edited a comment on pull request #30167:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/30167#issuecomment-718330774
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to
