[GitHub] [spark] SparkQA removed a comment on pull request #28988: [SPARK-32163][SQL] Nested pruning should work even with cosmetic variations

SparkQA removed a comment on pull request #28988: URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/28988#issuecomment-654952432 **[Test build #125233 has started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/125233/testReport)** for PR 28988 at commit [`d352dbc`](https://gi

[GitHub] [spark] SparkQA removed a comment on pull request #28988: [SPARK-32163][SQL] Nested pruning should work even with cosmetic variations

SparkQA removed a comment on pull request #28988: URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/28988#issuecomment-654668685 **[Test build #125194 has started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/125194/testReport)** for PR 28988 at commit [`04f6bb6`](https://gi

[GitHub] [spark] SparkQA removed a comment on pull request #28988: [SPARK-32163][SQL] Nested pruning should work even with cosmetic variations

SparkQA removed a comment on pull request #28988: URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/28988#issuecomment-654569914 **[Test build #125166 has started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/125166/testReport)** for PR 28988 at commit [`04f6bb6`](https://gi

[GitHub] [spark] SparkQA removed a comment on pull request #28988: [SPARK-32163][SQL] Nested pruning should work even with cosmetic variations

SparkQA removed a comment on pull request #28988: URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/28988#issuecomment-654559977 **[Test build #125162 has started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/125162/testReport)** for PR 28988 at commit [`04f6bb6`](https://gi

[GitHub] [spark] SparkQA removed a comment on pull request #28988: [SPARK-32163][SQL] Nested pruning should work even with cosmetic variations

SparkQA removed a comment on pull request #28988: URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/28988#issuecomment-654512253 **[Test build #125146 has started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/125146/testReport)** for PR 28988 at commit [`04f6bb6`](https://gi

[GitHub] [spark] SparkQA removed a comment on pull request #28988: [SPARK-32163][SQL] Nested pruning should work even with cosmetic variations

SparkQA removed a comment on pull request #28988: URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/28988#issuecomment-654059270 **[Test build #125040 has started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/125040/testReport)** for PR 28988 at commit [`04f6bb6`](https://gi

[GitHub] [spark] SparkQA removed a comment on pull request #28988: [SPARK-32163][SQL] Nested pruning should work even with cosmetic variations

SparkQA removed a comment on pull request #28988: URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/28988#issuecomment-654047169 **[Test build #125035 has started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/125035/testReport)** for PR 28988 at commit [`04f6bb6`](https://gi

[GitHub] [spark] SparkQA removed a comment on pull request #28988: [SPARK-32163][SQL] Nested pruning should work even with cosmetic variations

SparkQA removed a comment on pull request #28988: URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/28988#issuecomment-653966444 **[Test build #124991 has started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/124991/testReport)** for PR 28988 at commit [`04f6bb6`](https://gi

[GitHub] [spark] SparkQA removed a comment on pull request #28988: [SPARK-32163][SQL] Nested pruning should work even with cosmetic variations

SparkQA removed a comment on pull request #28988: URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/28988#issuecomment-653931843 **[Test build #124928 has started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/124928/testReport)** for PR 28988 at commit [`04f6bb6`](https://gi