agrawaldevesh commented on pull request #29032:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/29032#issuecomment-662828785
> Merged, thanks everyone.
>
> I don't know if we have a good principle around naming host v. worker with
the deprecation.
Thanks @holdenk for championing
agrawaldevesh commented on pull request #29032:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/29032#issuecomment-662789786
@holdenk... this is ready to go in. Thanks !
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To
agrawaldevesh commented on pull request #29032:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/29032#issuecomment-662720666
retest this please
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message,
agrawaldevesh commented on pull request #29032:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/29032#issuecomment-662151410
@holdenk, this is ready again for your review. Thanks !
This is an automated message from the Apache Git
agrawaldevesh commented on pull request #29032:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/29032#issuecomment-660432463
@holdenk ... It would be great for you to review this PR. This PR stems from
your suggestion of plumbing a "isWorkerLost" to the executor decommission
message, as you
agrawaldevesh commented on pull request #29032:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/29032#issuecomment-657764758
Jenkins, retest this please
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the
agrawaldevesh commented on pull request #29032:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/29032#issuecomment-657763170
Retest this please.
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the
agrawaldevesh commented on pull request #29032:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/29032#issuecomment-656474836
@holdenk, @jiangxb1987 @cloud-fan @Ngone51 -- This PR is ready for your
review please. Thanks !
This is
