amanomer commented on issue #26454: [SPARK-29818][MLLIB] Missing persist on RDD
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/26454#issuecomment-554657348
I know it's not related. But want you to review that.
This is an automated
amanomer commented on issue #26454: [SPARK-29818][MLLIB] Missing persist on RDD
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/26454#issuecomment-553545657
@srowen kindly help me to review this PR
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/26317
amanomer commented on issue #26454: [SPARK-29818][MLLIB] Missing persist on RDD
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/26454#issuecomment-553477017
cc @srowen
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To
amanomer commented on issue #26454: [SPARK-29818][MLLIB] Missing persist on RDD
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/26454#issuecomment-552450738
@srowen There are some JIRA tickets created for unnecessary use of persist
and improper persist strategy (like
amanomer commented on issue #26454: [SPARK-29818][MLLIB] Missing persist on RDD
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/26454#issuecomment-552176930
I have not tested this patch on any performance benchmark but I think these
functions are quite generic, most of the applications/vendors
amanomer commented on issue #26454: [SPARK-29818][MLLIB] Missing persist on RDD
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/26454#issuecomment-552131684
@srowen @MaxGekk Kindly, review this PR.
This is an automated message from
