[GitHub] [spark] beliefer commented on pull request #29999: [SPARK-33045][SQL] Support build-in function like_all and fix StackOverflowError issue.

beliefer commented on pull request #2: URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2#issuecomment-730797910 @cloud-fan @wangyum @maropu Thanks for all your work! This is an automated message from the Apache Git

[GitHub] [spark] beliefer commented on pull request #29999: [SPARK-33045][SQL] Support build-in function like_all and fix StackOverflowError issue.

beliefer commented on pull request #2: URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2#issuecomment-730203321 retest this please This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please

[GitHub] [spark] beliefer commented on pull request #29999: [SPARK-33045][SQL] Support build-in function like_all and fix StackOverflowError issue.

beliefer commented on pull request #2: URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2#issuecomment-728768216 retest this please This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please

[GitHub] [spark] beliefer commented on pull request #29999: [SPARK-33045][SQL] Support build-in function like_all and fix StackOverflowError issue.

beliefer commented on pull request #2: URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2#issuecomment-725272877 retest this please This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please

[GitHub] [spark] beliefer commented on pull request #29999: [SPARK-33045][SQL] Support build-in function like_all and fix StackOverflowError issue.

beliefer commented on pull request #2: URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2#issuecomment-725081708 cc @cloud-fan @wangyum This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message,

[GitHub] [spark] beliefer commented on pull request #29999: [SPARK-33045][SQL] Support build-in function like_all and fix StackOverflowError issue.

beliefer commented on pull request #2: URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2#issuecomment-714287382 retest this please This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please

[GitHub] [spark] beliefer commented on pull request #29999: [SPARK-33045][SQL] Support build-in function like_all and fix StackOverflowError issue.

beliefer commented on pull request #2: URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2#issuecomment-709985924 retest this please This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please

[GitHub] [spark] beliefer commented on pull request #29999: [SPARK-33045][SQL] Support build-in function like_all and fix StackOverflowError issue.

beliefer commented on pull request #2: URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2#issuecomment-707458123 @maropu If there have a lot of like, the reduceLeft will construct very deep tree. This will lead to unlimited function calls to increase the height of the thread stack.

[GitHub] [spark] beliefer commented on pull request #29999: [SPARK-33045][SQL] Support build-in function like_all and fix StackOverflowError issue.

beliefer commented on pull request #2: URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2#issuecomment-706919752 retest this please This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please

[GitHub] [spark] beliefer commented on pull request #29999: [SPARK-33045][SQL] Support build-in function like_all and fix StackOverflowError issue.

beliefer commented on pull request #2: URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2#issuecomment-706840400 > I have the same impression like @maropu 's first comment. Could you answer his question please, @beliefer ? Thanks for your remind.

[GitHub] [spark] beliefer commented on pull request #29999: [SPARK-33045][SQL] Support build-in function like_all and fix StackOverflowError issue.

beliefer commented on pull request #2: URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2#issuecomment-706839025 > In the PR description, could you describe why the stack overflow can happen in the current approach and why the fix in this PR can avoid the error? OK