[GitHub] [spark] bmarcott commented on issue #27207: [WIP][SPARK-18886][CORE] Make Locality wait time measure resource under utilization due to delay scheduling.

2020-02-26 Thread GitBox
bmarcott commented on issue #27207: [WIP][SPARK-18886][CORE] Make Locality wait time measure resource under utilization due to delay scheduling. URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/27207#issuecomment-591813279 No problem. I believe what's remaining is just some tests on

[GitHub] [spark] bmarcott commented on issue #27207: [WIP][SPARK-18886][CORE] Make Locality wait time measure resource under utilization due to delay scheduling.

2020-02-23 Thread GitBox
bmarcott commented on issue #27207: [WIP][SPARK-18886][CORE] Make Locality wait time measure resource under utilization due to delay scheduling. URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/27207#issuecomment-590155884 checking back in, who is up for another round of review :)?

[GitHub] [spark] bmarcott commented on issue #27207: [WIP][SPARK-18886][CORE] Make Locality wait time measure resource under utilization due to delay scheduling.

2020-02-09 Thread GitBox
bmarcott commented on issue #27207: [WIP][SPARK-18886][CORE] Make Locality wait time measure resource under utilization due to delay scheduling. URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/27207#issuecomment-583947229 > Is it possible to centralize the delay scheduling code? Now it's in both

[GitHub] [spark] bmarcott commented on issue #27207: [WIP][SPARK-18886][CORE] Make Locality wait time measure resource under utilization due to delay scheduling.

2020-02-03 Thread GitBox
bmarcott commented on issue #27207: [WIP][SPARK-18886][CORE] Make Locality wait time measure resource under utilization due to delay scheduling. URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/27207#issuecomment-581758371 @Ngone51 thanks for taking a look. I wouldn't say it puts one thing

[GitHub] [spark] bmarcott commented on issue #27207: [WIP][SPARK-18886][CORE] Make Locality wait time measure resource under utilization due to delay scheduling.

2020-02-01 Thread GitBox
bmarcott commented on issue #27207: [WIP][SPARK-18886][CORE] Make Locality wait time measure resource under utilization due to delay scheduling. URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/27207#issuecomment-581102206 @tgravescs I updated with the new config to switch to legacy behavior

[GitHub] [spark] bmarcott commented on issue #27207: [WIP][SPARK-18886][CORE] Make Locality wait time measure resource under utilization due to delay scheduling.

2020-01-31 Thread GitBox
bmarcott commented on issue #27207: [WIP][SPARK-18886][CORE] Make Locality wait time measure resource under utilization due to delay scheduling. URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/27207#issuecomment-580842627 yea, I'll try to take a look this weekend. Thanks for checking in.

[GitHub] [spark] bmarcott commented on issue #27207: [WIP][SPARK-18886][CORE] Make Locality wait time measure resource under utilization due to delay scheduling.

2020-01-23 Thread GitBox
bmarcott commented on issue #27207: [WIP][SPARK-18886][CORE] Make Locality wait time measure resource under utilization due to delay scheduling. URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/27207#issuecomment-578006160 @cloud-fan thanks for the input @tgravescs yep, that

[GitHub] [spark] bmarcott commented on issue #27207: [WIP][SPARK-18886][CORE] Make Locality wait time measure resource under utilization due to delay scheduling.

2020-01-21 Thread GitBox
bmarcott commented on issue #27207: [WIP][SPARK-18886][CORE] Make Locality wait time measure resource under utilization due to delay scheduling. URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/27207#issuecomment-576995950 That may be reasonable to do, but I'd like to avoid adding more

[GitHub] [spark] bmarcott commented on issue #27207: [WIP][SPARK-18886][CORE] Make Locality wait time measure resource under utilization due to delay scheduling.

2020-01-15 Thread GitBox
bmarcott commented on issue #27207: [WIP][SPARK-18886][CORE] Make Locality wait time measure resource under utilization due to delay scheduling. URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/27207#issuecomment-575011886 @tgravescs Thanks for the comments. > so please update the