dongjoon-hyun commented on issue #27695:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/27695#issuecomment-616923286
Got it. Thanks, @onursatici .
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message
dongjoon-hyun commented on issue #27695: [SPARK-30949][K8S][CORE] decouple
requests and parallelism on kubernetes drivers
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/27695#issuecomment-615905091
Gentle ping, @onursatici .
This
dongjoon-hyun commented on issue #27695: [SPARK-30949][K8S][CORE] decouple
requests and parallelism on kubernetes drivers
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/27695#issuecomment-614910556
How do you think about the above comment, @onursatici ? I'm wondering your
opinion.
dongjoon-hyun commented on issue #27695: [SPARK-30949][K8S][CORE] decouple
requests and parallelism on kubernetes drivers
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/27695#issuecomment-613799273
@onursatici . I'm still not sure about this approach.
- First, K8s environment is different fr
dongjoon-hyun commented on issue #27695: [SPARK-30949][K8S][CORE] decouple
requests and parallelism on kubernetes drivers
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/27695#issuecomment-600222788
Hi, @jiangxb1987 . What do you mean by **this**? This PR or this old JDK bug?
> Since this also
dongjoon-hyun commented on issue #27695: [SPARK-30949][K8S][CORE] decouple
requests and parallelism on kubernetes drivers
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/27695#issuecomment-594823234
@onursatici . One thing I'm thinking is the deprecation of `8u120` and the
older at 3.0.0. Until
dongjoon-hyun commented on issue #27695: [SPARK-30949][K8S][CORE] decouple
requests and parallelism on kubernetes drivers
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/27695#issuecomment-592820588
Gentle ping, @onursatici .
This
dongjoon-hyun commented on issue #27695: [SPARK-30949][K8S][CORE] decouple
requests and parallelism on kubernetes drivers
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/27695#issuecomment-591197574
Ping @holdenk since the flakiness of `Test basic decommissioning` is
observed again.
```
-