fqaiser94 commented on pull request #27066:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/27066#issuecomment-654992303
Done, and thank you all for a great experience!
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To r
fqaiser94 commented on pull request #27066:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/27066#issuecomment-654559706
looks like a flaky test failed unfortunately
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To resp
fqaiser94 commented on pull request #27066:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/27066#issuecomment-654437327
Not sure why but it looks like someone aborted the build mid-way.
Can someone please kick-off a new build? I don't think I'm not on the
jenkins white-list
---
fqaiser94 commented on pull request #27066:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/27066#issuecomment-653940530
retest this please
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please
fqaiser94 commented on pull request #27066:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/27066#issuecomment-653934332
test this please
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please l
fqaiser94 commented on pull request #27066:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/27066#issuecomment-652633017
No problems, it was worth a try. Thanks for looking into it!
This is an automated message from the Apache Git
fqaiser94 commented on pull request #27066:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/27066#issuecomment-652443144
Hey @cloud-fan , I've been attempting to make this idea work for a couple of
weeks now without success.
I made some small changes and am able to get the Scala code to c
fqaiser94 commented on pull request #27066:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/27066#issuecomment-646429505
> Can you explain more about this?
Please see the comment from @dbtsai
[here](https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/27066#issuecomment-609512144) for a
more thorough ex
fqaiser94 commented on pull request #27066:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/27066#issuecomment-645047815
@cloud-fan I've made fairly significant changes to the implementation in
order to address the issue where poorly optimized physical plans resulted in
massive amounts of java c
fqaiser94 commented on pull request #27066:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/27066#issuecomment-642984217
> BTW Spark does common subexpressions elimination during codegen, so
repeated expressions don't mean they are evaluated repeatedly.
You're right, I forgot about this.
fqaiser94 commented on pull request #27066:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/27066#issuecomment-640747267
@cloud-fan
Thanks for your PR. I've merged your changes into this branch with some
modifications in order to pass the tests.
> Remove the SQL API. It's unclear
11 matches
Mail list logo
