[GitHub] [spark] lucaspompeun commented on pull request #40614: [SPARK-42987][DOCS] Correction of protobuf sql documentation

2023-04-03 Thread via GitHub
lucaspompeun commented on PR #40614: URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/40614#issuecomment-1495147474 @rangadi Done! -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment.

[GitHub] [spark] lucaspompeun commented on pull request #40614: [SPARK-42987][DOCS] Correction of protobuf sql documentation

2023-04-03 Thread via GitHub
lucaspompeun commented on PR #40614: URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/40614#issuecomment-1495086264 @rangadi the first two fixes were made -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to

[GitHub] [spark] lucaspompeun commented on pull request #40614: [SPARK-42987][DOCS] Correction of protobuf sql documentation

2023-04-03 Thread via GitHub
lucaspompeun commented on PR #40614: URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/40614#issuecomment-1494738923 The adition of any should be added in wich table? Protobuf -> Spark SQL or Spark SQL -> Protobuf? -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the mes

[GitHub] [spark] lucaspompeun commented on pull request #40614: [SPARK-42987][DOCS] Correction of protobuf sql documentation

2023-03-30 Thread via GitHub
lucaspompeun commented on PR #40614: URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/40614#issuecomment-1491167649 I'have corrected the problem that cause build error in github workflow -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHu