mridulm commented on PR #40393:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/40393#issuecomment-1478905577
Is your jira id `StoveM` @Stove-hust ?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the
mridulm commented on PR #40393:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/40393#issuecomment-1478833979
I could not cherry pick this into 3.4 and 3.3 - we should fix for those
branches as well IMO.
Can you create a PR against those two branches as well @Stove-hust ? Thanks
--
This is a
mridulm commented on PR #40393:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/40393#issuecomment-1478833621
Merged to master.
Thanks for working on this @Stove-hust !
Thanks for the review @otterc :-)
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message,
mridulm commented on PR #40393:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/40393#issuecomment-1476585572
The test failure is unrelated to this PR - once the changes above are made,
the reexecution should pass
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the me
mridulm commented on PR #40393:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/40393#issuecomment-1475538274
Technically, 3 :-)
The UT that I added will generate 2 tests - one for push based shuffle and
one without.
And we have the initial test you added.
--
This is an automated message
mridulm commented on PR #40393:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/40393#issuecomment-1474986959
@Stove-hust To clarify - I meant add this as well.
We should keep the UT you had added - and it is important to test the
specific expectation as it stands today.
--
This is an automa
mridulm commented on PR #40393:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/40393#issuecomment-1474782673
Instead of testing specifically for the flag - which is subject to change as
the implementation evolves, we should test for behavior here.
This is the reproducible test I was using
mridulm commented on PR #40393:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/40393#issuecomment-1473171295
So this is an interesting coincidence, I literally encountered a production
job which seems to be hitting this exact same issue :-)
I was in the process of creating a test case, but my