[GitHub] [spark] viirya commented on pull request #28988: [SPARK-32163][SQL] Nested pruning should work even with cosmetic variations

viirya commented on pull request #28988: URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/28988#issuecomment-655041608 Thanks all. Sure, let me create a backporting PR for branch-3.0. This is an automated message from the Apache

[GitHub] [spark] viirya commented on pull request #28988: [SPARK-32163][SQL] Nested pruning should work even with cosmetic variations

viirya commented on pull request #28988: URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/28988#issuecomment-654568342 retest this please This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please

[GitHub] [spark] viirya commented on pull request #28988: [SPARK-32163][SQL] Nested pruning should work even with cosmetic variations

viirya commented on pull request #28988: URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/28988#issuecomment-654557984 retest this please This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please

[GitHub] [spark] viirya commented on pull request #28988: [SPARK-32163][SQL] Nested pruning should work even with cosmetic variations

viirya commented on pull request #28988: URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/28988#issuecomment-654513520 The Jenkins looks unstable. This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message,

[GitHub] [spark] viirya commented on pull request #28988: [SPARK-32163][SQL] Nested pruning should work even with cosmetic variations

viirya commented on pull request #28988: URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/28988#issuecomment-654511980 retest this please This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please

[GitHub] [spark] viirya commented on pull request #28988: [SPARK-32163][SQL] Nested pruning should work even with cosmetic variations

viirya commented on pull request #28988: URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/28988#issuecomment-654058482 retest this please This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please

[GitHub] [spark] viirya commented on pull request #28988: [SPARK-32163][SQL] Nested pruning should work even with cosmetic variations

viirya commented on pull request #28988: URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/28988#issuecomment-654044476 retest this please... This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message,

[GitHub] [spark] viirya commented on pull request #28988: [SPARK-32163][SQL] Nested pruning should work even with cosmetic variations

viirya commented on pull request #28988: URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/28988#issuecomment-653965776 retest this please This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please

[GitHub] [spark] viirya commented on pull request #28988: [SPARK-32163][SQL] Nested pruning should work even with cosmetic variations

viirya commented on pull request #28988: URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/28988#issuecomment-653363617 This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and

[GitHub] [spark] viirya commented on pull request #28988: [SPARK-32163][SQL] Nested pruning should work even with cosmetic variations

viirya commented on pull request #28988: URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/28988#issuecomment-653309013 You can rebase after this gets merged. This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to

[GitHub] [spark] viirya commented on pull request #28988: [SPARK-32163][SQL] Nested pruning should work even with cosmetic variations

viirya commented on pull request #28988: URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/28988#issuecomment-653299648 cc @maropu @dongjoon-hyun @frankyin-factual This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond