xuanyuanking commented on pull request #32272:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/32272#issuecomment-850078509
Thanks for the review and help!
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to
xuanyuanking commented on pull request #32272:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/32272#issuecomment-849468978
@HeartSaVioR Sure, thanks for reminding.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL
xuanyuanking commented on pull request #32272:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/32272#issuecomment-847455327
```
Sorry for late. I will find some time in the weekend to look at this.
```
No worries, thanks for the detailed review! Take your time.
--
This is an automated
xuanyuanking commented on pull request #32272:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/32272#issuecomment-843247088
To provide more context for the functions in this PR, I created the WIP PR
(#32582) and referenced the comment there. Please check whether we can ship
this for now. Thanks
xuanyuanking commented on pull request #32272:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/32272#issuecomment-842119218
```
About the file name, RocksDBFileManager.scala doesn't contain any
RocksDBFileManager. Shall we rename it?
```
All these checkpointing metadata is for
xuanyuanking commented on pull request #32272:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/32272#issuecomment-842119218
```
About the file name, RocksDBFileManager.scala doesn't contain any
RocksDBFileManager. Shall we rename it?
```
All these checkpointing metadata is for
xuanyuanking commented on pull request #32272:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/32272#issuecomment-840445866
```
there're some sorts of uncertainty during reviewing as there's no reference
PR. In other words, we are reviewing methods which we don't have idea how these
methods
xuanyuanking commented on pull request #32272:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/32272#issuecomment-830078472
@HeartSaVioR Thanks for the advice. Comments have been resolved and yes, it
makes sense to reflect them to the PRs. The current implementation for