xwu99 commented on pull request #28229:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/28229#issuecomment-689258025
@zhengruifeng, any progress on this?
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the m
xwu99 commented on pull request #28229:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/28229#issuecomment-636476467
> @xwu99 Thanks for your work. The speedup is promising.
>
> Since this issue (blockify+gemv/gemm) need more discussion with other
committers, so I am working on retest thos
xwu99 commented on pull request #28229:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/28229#issuecomment-620522247
@zhengruifeng I saw your PR was merged, I will rebase. I am preparing some
benchmarks. let's focus on dense case first. For sparse cases, we can use
original path.
@srowen @men
xwu99 commented on pull request #28229:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/28229#issuecomment-620979554
> > I saw your PR was merged, I will rebase.
>
> I had some reverted PRs on using high-level BLAS in LoR/LiR/SVC/GMM, they
were reverted because of performance regression on
xwu99 commented on pull request #28229:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/28229#issuecomment-624989871
> @xwu99 There was a
[ticket](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-30641) for this.
> Now I had merged high-level BLAS supports for
[LinearSVC](https://github.com/apache
xwu99 commented on pull request #28229:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/28229#issuecomment-624993186
@zhengruifeng btw. There is [a closed PR for
ALS](https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13891) which is my colleague's work
before he left. I would like to rework it. Could you als
