[GitHub] spark issue #12583: [SPARK-14819] [SQL] Improve SET / SET -v command

Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12583 Hi, @bomeng , do you have something to refresh here? I think we can close this for now. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitH

[GitHub] spark issue #12583: [SPARK-14819] [SQL] Improve SET / SET -v command

Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12583 @dongjoon-hyun, then, do you mind if I ask if this PR is not useful in favour of #16579? --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub a

[GitHub] spark issue #12583: [SPARK-14819] [SQL] Improve SET / SET -v command

Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12583 I made another #16579 for `SET` for a sorted result. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h

[GitHub] spark issue #12583: [SPARK-14819] [SQL] Improve SET / SET -v command

Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12583 Hmm. This PR seems to be stale. Actually, what I wanted was a **sorted** result of `SET` and `SET -v`. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply ap

[GitHub] spark issue #12583: [SPARK-14819] [SQL] Improve SET / SET -v command

Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12583 Hi, @bomeng . I hit the same issue. Could you update the PR? --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec