[GitHub] spark issue #13803: [SPARK-16109][SPARKR][DOC] R more doc fixes

2016-06-21 Thread shivaram
Github user shivaram commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13803 Irrespective of people reading the guide, it'll at least be useful to point out what is the expected behavior in a code review etc. But yeah automatic style checks would be really cool. --- If y

[GitHub] spark issue #13803: [SPARK-16109][SPARKR][DOC] R more doc fixes

2016-06-21 Thread felixcheung
Github user felixcheung commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13803 I have been thinking about the same thing - problem is people generally do not read contribution guide :) if there is a way to get automatic style check it would be good. --- If your project i

[GitHub] spark issue #13803: [SPARK-16109][SPARKR][DOC] R more doc fixes

2016-06-21 Thread shivaram
Github user shivaram commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13803 Yeah - thanks for all the work in cleaning this up. One thing that i was wondering is we could add some style guide checks or contribution guide rules on how to maintain documentation. We can discu

[GitHub] spark issue #13803: [SPARK-16109][SPARKR][DOC] R more doc fixes

2016-06-21 Thread felixcheung
Github user felixcheung commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13803 Great! Thanks! Hopefully now docs are in much better shape. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does n

[GitHub] spark issue #13803: [SPARK-16109][SPARKR][DOC] R more doc fixes

2016-06-21 Thread AmplabJenkins
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13803 Test PASSed. Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed): https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60942/ Test PASSed. ---

[GitHub] spark issue #13803: [SPARK-16109][SPARKR][DOC] R more doc fixes

2016-06-21 Thread AmplabJenkins
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13803 Merged build finished. Test PASSed. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature e

[GitHub] spark issue #13803: [SPARK-16109][SPARKR][DOC] R more doc fixes

2016-06-21 Thread shivaram
Github user shivaram commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13803 LGTM. Merging this --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so,

[GitHub] spark issue #13803: [SPARK-16109][SPARKR][DOC] R more doc fixes

2016-06-21 Thread SparkQA
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13803 **[Test build #60942 has finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60942/consoleFull)** for PR 13803 at commit [`0bc74c3`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/

[GitHub] spark issue #13803: [SPARK-16109][SPARKR][DOC] R more doc fixes

2016-06-21 Thread shivaram
Github user shivaram commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13803 Thanks - rebuilt locally and the docs look good. Will merge after Jenkins passes --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If

[GitHub] spark issue #13803: [SPARK-16109][SPARKR][DOC] R more doc fixes

2016-06-21 Thread SparkQA
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13803 **[Test build #60942 has started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/60942/consoleFull)** for PR 13803 at commit [`0bc74c3`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/0

[GitHub] spark issue #13803: [SPARK-16109][SPARKR][DOC] R more doc fixes

2016-06-21 Thread felixcheung
Github user felixcheung commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13803 done - @family doesn't need to be one word so added "stat functions" --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your proje

[GitHub] spark issue #13803: [SPARK-16109][SPARKR][DOC] R more doc fixes

2016-06-21 Thread shivaram
Github user shivaram commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13803 Other than the comment about the `family` link the rest of the changes look good --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If