Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14826
@mengxr what do you think about this narrower change? just double-checking.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your pro
Github user BryanCutler commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14826
Just a small comment, and I also vote for changing the the default
BisectingKmeans to `seed=None` to be consistent. Other than that, LGTM!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply t
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14826
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64465/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14826
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14826
**[Test build #64465 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64465/consoleFull)**
for PR 14826 at commit
[`8ac4a9b`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14826
**[Test build #64465 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/64465/consoleFull)**
for PR 14826 at commit
[`8ac4a9b`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/8
