Github user naliazheli commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15517
dataset.checkpoint is what i need.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enab
Github user liancheng commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15517
I'm closing this since caching is not the ultimate solution for this
problem anyway. Caching is too memory consuming when you, say, computing
connected components in an iterative way over a graph
Github user liancheng commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15517
The most recent version still breaks some test cases related to caching.
Investigating it.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub a
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15517
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15517
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67208/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15517
**[Test build #67208 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67208/consoleFull)**
for PR 15517 at commit
[`fffbd69`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15517
**[Test build #67208 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67208/consoleFull)**
for PR 15517 at commit
[`fffbd69`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/f
Github user yhuai commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15517
cc @mengxr and @jkbradley
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15517
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67120/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15517
**[Test build #67120 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67120/consoleFull)**
for PR 15517 at commit
[`e1283a8`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15517
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user liancheng commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15517
The previous test failure was because we replace the analyzed plan with
`withCacheData`, while cache manager uses the original analyzed plan as keys.
Force-pushed a new and much simpler ap
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15517
**[Test build #67120 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67120/consoleFull)**
for PR 15517 at commit
[`e1283a8`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/e
13 matches
Mail list logo
