Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16135
**[Test build #69634 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69634/consoleFull)**
for PR 16135 at commit
[`8718ec3`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16135
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69634/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16135
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16135
**[Test build #69635 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69635/consoleFull)**
for PR 16135 at commit
[`a1d9a3c`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/a
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16135
**[Test build #69635 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69635/consoleFull)**
for PR 16135 at commit
[`a1d9a3c`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16135
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16135
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69635/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16135
**[Test build #69660 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69660/consoleFull)**
for PR 16135 at commit
[`95aabb8`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/9
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16135
**[Test build #69660 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69660/consoleFull)**
for PR 16135 at commit
[`95aabb8`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16135
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16135
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69660/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user xuanyuanking commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16135
@rxin @liancheng
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes s
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16135
cc @ericl can you take a look at this?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enable
Github user ericl commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16135
Isn't it sufficient to lock around the `catalog.filterPartitions(Nil)`? Why
do we need reader locks?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on Gi
Github user xuanyuanking commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16135
@ericl Thanks for your review.
> Is it sufficient to lock around the catalog.filterPartitions(Nil)?
Yes, this patch port from 1.6.2 and I missed the diff here. Fixed in next
patch.
Github user ericl commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16135
I guess the large number of lock sites is confusing me. We only want to
prevent concurrent instantiation of a single table, so shouldn't you only need
1 lock for that site?
Also, we should ha
16 matches
Mail list logo