[GitHub] spark issue #16841: [SPARK-18871][SQL][TESTS] New test cases for IN/NOT IN s...

2017-02-23 Thread robbinspg
Github user robbinspg commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16841 OK I'll raise a separate Jira, document the differences and submit a PR --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your

[GitHub] spark issue #16841: [SPARK-18871][SQL][TESTS] New test cases for IN/NOT IN s...

2017-02-22 Thread kevinyu98
Github user kevinyu98 commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16841 @gatorsmile sure, I will do that. Thanks. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this

[GitHub] spark issue #16841: [SPARK-18871][SQL][TESTS] New test cases for IN/NOT IN s...

2017-02-22 Thread gatorsmile
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16841 To make the results consistent between big endian and small endian, we can improve the queries with the extra order by clauses. @robbinspg Which queries failed? @kevinyu98 Can you

[GitHub] spark issue #16841: [SPARK-18871][SQL][TESTS] New test cases for IN/NOT IN s...

2017-02-22 Thread kevinyu98
Github user kevinyu98 commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16841 Hello Pete: Thanks for running the test case. Can you send the failing test case file to me? Also I can provide new test files with the output files, can you help test on your platforms? thanks.

[GitHub] spark issue #16841: [SPARK-18871][SQL][TESTS] New test cases for IN/NOT IN s...

2017-02-22 Thread robbinspg
Github user robbinspg commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16841 @kevinyu98 Several of the new tests fail on Big Endian platforms. It appears that rows are returned in a slightly different order but are still a correct output from the query. For example

[GitHub] spark issue #16841: [SPARK-18871][SQL][TESTS] New test cases for IN/NOT IN s...

2017-02-16 Thread gatorsmile
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16841 LGTM --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the

[GitHub] spark issue #16841: [SPARK-18871][SQL][TESTS] New test cases for IN/NOT IN s...

2017-02-16 Thread AmplabJenkins
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16841 Test PASSed. Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed): https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72984/ Test PASSed. ---

[GitHub] spark issue #16841: [SPARK-18871][SQL][TESTS] New test cases for IN/NOT IN s...

2017-02-16 Thread AmplabJenkins
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16841 Merged build finished. Test PASSed. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature

[GitHub] spark issue #16841: [SPARK-18871][SQL][TESTS] New test cases for IN/NOT IN s...

2017-02-16 Thread gatorsmile
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16841 Thanks! Merging to master. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and

[GitHub] spark issue #16841: [SPARK-18871][SQL][TESTS] New test cases for IN/NOT IN s...

2017-02-15 Thread SparkQA
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16841 **[Test build #72984 has finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72984/testReport)** for PR 16841 at commit

[GitHub] spark issue #16841: [SPARK-18871][SQL][TESTS] New test cases for IN/NOT IN s...

2017-02-15 Thread SparkQA
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16841 **[Test build #72984 has started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72984/testReport)** for PR 16841 at commit

[GitHub] spark issue #16841: [SPARK-18871][SQL][TESTS] New test cases for IN/NOT IN s...

2017-02-15 Thread gatorsmile
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16841 ok to test --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if

[GitHub] spark issue #16841: [SPARK-18871][SQL][TESTS] New test cases for IN/NOT IN s...

2017-02-15 Thread gatorsmile
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16841 test this please --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes

[GitHub] spark issue #16841: [SPARK-18871][SQL][TESTS] New test cases for IN/NOT IN s...

2017-02-15 Thread gatorsmile
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16841 retest this please --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes

[GitHub] spark issue #16841: [SPARK-18871][SQL][TESTS] New test cases for IN/NOT IN s...

2017-02-13 Thread AmplabJenkins
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16841 Merged build finished. Test PASSed. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature

[GitHub] spark issue #16841: [SPARK-18871][SQL][TESTS] New test cases for IN/NOT IN s...

2017-02-13 Thread AmplabJenkins
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16841 Test PASSed. Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed): https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72833/ Test PASSed. ---

[GitHub] spark issue #16841: [SPARK-18871][SQL][TESTS] New test cases for IN/NOT IN s...

2017-02-13 Thread SparkQA
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16841 **[Test build #72833 has finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72833/testReport)** for PR 16841 at commit

[GitHub] spark issue #16841: [SPARK-18871][SQL][TESTS] New test cases for IN/NOT IN s...

2017-02-13 Thread SparkQA
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16841 **[Test build #72833 has started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72833/testReport)** for PR 16841 at commit

[GitHub] spark issue #16841: [SPARK-18871][SQL][TESTS] New test cases for IN/NOT IN s...

2017-02-13 Thread gatorsmile
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16841 test this please --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so,

[GitHub] spark issue #16841: [SPARK-18871][SQL][TESTS] New test cases for IN/NOT IN s...

2017-02-13 Thread gatorsmile
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16841 OK to test --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if

[GitHub] spark issue #16841: [SPARK-18871][SQL][TESTS] New test cases for IN/NOT IN s...

2017-02-07 Thread AmplabJenkins
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16841 Can one of the admins verify this patch? --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this