Github user maropu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17174
@dongjoon-hyun Thanks for your checks!! I still wait for other developer's
feedbacks. If the approach is positive, I'll make a pr. Also, welcome another
idea to solve this. cc: @gatorsmile
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17174
@maropu . +1 for your idea.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands,
Github user maropu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17174
I looked into the code and I thought out another solution for this issue;
it tries to detect specific binary comparisons in `Optimizer`, and then
replaces them with specialized ones;
POC:
Github user wangyum commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17174
@tanejagagan Are you still working on?
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user hindog commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17174
I believe another performance impact related to this may be attributed to
the `cast` operator failing to match during filter-pushdown, meaning that the
filter on the timestamp will NOT get pushed
Github user maropu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17174
@tanejagagan Can you update?
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17174
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17174
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17174
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17174
ping @tanejagagan
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17174
Thanks for investigation. This is definitely very useful to the other Spark
users. Maybe you can make a change the existing document
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17174
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
12 matches
Mail list logo
