[GitHub] spark issue #18729: [SPARK-21526] [MLlib] Add support to ML LogisticRegressi...

2018-01-18 Thread AmplabJenkins
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18729 Can one of the admins verify this patch? --- - To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org For additional

[GitHub] spark issue #18729: [SPARK-21526] [MLlib] Add support to ML LogisticRegressi...

2017-07-24 Thread JohnHBrock
Github user JohnHBrock commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18729 This contribution is my original work and I license the work to the project under the project’s open source license. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have

[GitHub] spark issue #18729: [SPARK-21526] [MLlib] Add support to ML LogisticRegressi...

2017-07-24 Thread AmplabJenkins
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18729 Can one of the admins verify this patch? --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feat

[GitHub] spark issue #18729: [SPARK-21526] [MLlib] Add support to ML LogisticRegressi...

2017-07-25 Thread MLnick
Github user MLnick commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18729 Hi there, thanks for this. However, please see #18610 and related JIRA tickets. The solution is slightly more complex and needs to be done in a more generic way. I suggest that this be updated once a

[GitHub] spark issue #18729: [SPARK-21526] [MLlib] Add support to ML LogisticRegressi...

2017-12-05 Thread JohnHBrock
Github user JohnHBrock commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18729 #18610 seems to be stuck in purgatory. Is there any option other than waiting for that PR to be resolved? This feels like the perfect being the enemy of the good. --- -

[GitHub] spark issue #18729: [SPARK-21526] [MLlib] Add support to ML LogisticRegressi...

2017-12-05 Thread sethah
Github user sethah commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18729 I actually completely agree about perfect being the enemy of good in this case. We should provide something workable that can be safely modified in the future if needed. Still, this needs to be done

[GitHub] spark issue #18729: [SPARK-21526] [MLlib] Add support to ML LogisticRegressi...

2017-12-14 Thread AmplabJenkins
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18729 Can one of the admins verify this patch? --- - To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org For additional

[GitHub] spark issue #18729: [SPARK-21526] [MLlib] Add support to ML LogisticRegressi...

2018-06-08 Thread AmplabJenkins
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18729 Can one of the admins verify this patch? --- - To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org For additional

[GitHub] spark issue #18729: [SPARK-21526] [MLlib] Add support to ML LogisticRegressi...

2018-11-01 Thread AmplabJenkins
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18729 Can one of the admins verify this patch? --- - To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org For additional