Github user mgaido91 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19169
I think it could have been useful anyway (eg. a user inserting rows through
STS who wants to store the name of the user which is connecting to STS and
performing the operation), but I agree that th
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19169
So far, session-specific user management is not part of our plan yet. This
API is not useful before it. Could you please close this PR?
---
-
Github user mgaido91 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19169
On local I solved the build error by running a `mvn clean`. As pointed out
by @maropu , a PR removed the class and then the incremental compilation fails.
I am not sure why this is happening on jen
Github user maropu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19169
It seems the failure is caused by the version mismatch `v1.3` v.s. `v1.4`
in lz4-java (recently, I updated in
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18883). I'm not sure this happens in
jenkins though
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19169
The test failure with -9 in Jenkins is unknown up to my knowledge (although
there have been few clues and assumptions so far). It should be not related
with it.
---
--
Github user mgaido91 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19169
the error the build job is failing for is:
```
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/io/CompressionCodec.scala:24: imported
LZ4BlockInputStream' is permanently hidden by definition of object
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19169
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional comma
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19169
**[Test build #81580 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/81580/testReport)**
for PR 19169 at commit
[`6b0b6bd`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/6
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19169
**[Test build #81581 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/81581/testReport)**
for PR 19169 at commit
[`6b0b6bd`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/6
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19169
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/81580/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19169
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/81581/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19169
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional comma
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19169
**[Test build #81581 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/81581/testReport)**
for PR 19169 at commit
[`6b0b6bd`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/6b
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19169
**[Test build #81580 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/81580/testReport)**
for PR 19169 at commit
[`6b0b6bd`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/6b
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19169
ok to test
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@s
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19169
looks something is gone wrong with Jenkins command .. not sure why but
looks we should just say "ok to test"?
---
-
To unsub
Github user holdenk commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19169
The Python side looks reasonable, maybe @marmbrus can share his view on
adding this function in general?
In the mean time Jenkins OK to test.
---
--
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19169
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
18 matches
Mail list logo
