Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20434
Thanks! Merged to master/2.3
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands,
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20434
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/86835/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20434
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20434
**[Test build #86835 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/86835/testReport)**
for PR 20434 at commit
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20434
Yes. We need to avoid the performance regression since the last release
Spark 2.2
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20434
I see. The baseline is 2.2, right?
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20434
This is to revert back to the original behavior. Thus, we do not introduce
anything else compared with 2.2
---
-
To
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20434
@gatorsmile .
In the original PR, https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18810, there was a
microbenchmark.
Can we have the result on the same benchmark here, too?
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20434
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/testing-k8s-prb-make-spark-distribution/394/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20434
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20434
**[Test build #86835 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/86835/testReport)**
for PR 20434 at commit
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20434
@kiszk TPC-DS just shows the typical data analytics workloads. However,
Spark SQL is being used for ETL like workloads. The regression happened in a
complex pipeline of structured streaming
Github user kiszk commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20434
It would be good to put a problematic code for future fix.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For
Github user kiszk commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20434
Does this value lead to no performance degradation of other typical
workloads (e.g. TPC-DS)?
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20434
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/86813/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20434
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20434
**[Test build #86813 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/86813/testReport)**
for PR 20434 at commit
Github user sameeragarwal commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20434
LGTM
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20434
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/testing-k8s-prb-make-spark-distribution/377/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20434
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20434
cc @sameeragarwal @zsxwing @rxin @cloud-fan @rednaxelafx @yhuai
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20434
**[Test build #86813 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/86813/testReport)**
for PR 20434 at commit
22 matches
Mail list logo
