Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21188
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/testing-k8s-prb-make-spark-distribution/4227/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21188
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user xuanyuanking commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21188
@maasg as comment in #21194, I just consider we should not change the
behavior while `seconds > rampUpTimeSeconds`. Maybe it more important than
smooth.
---
Github user maasg commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21188
Hi Jerry,
There's an improvement from the original situation, but the initial ramp-up
phase starts only when the time gets very close to `rampUpTime`. Here you have
another example that shows the
Github user jerryshao commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21188
Isn't this a flat ramp-up smoothly increasing the rows per second? Your
proposal is another solution, but just two options...
---
Github user maasg commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21188
Hi Jerry,
I don't think the issue is solved with this patch. I plugged the new
function in my notebook and it still shows a rather flat ramp-up:
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21188
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/89952/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21188
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21188
**[Test build #89952 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/89952/testReport)**
for PR 21188 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21188
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/testing-k8s-prb-make-spark-distribution/2736/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21188
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21188
**[Test build #89952 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/89952/testReport)**
for PR 21188 at commit
12 matches
Mail list logo
