Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22278
If this is the only one, we could try to think differently but I guess
there are multiple APIs documented like this. They are all consistently marked
in the documentation and in the cod in this
Github user MichaelChirico commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22278
@HyukjinKwon this is about usability/user-friendliness. As mentioned,
despite being a seasoned R user & increasingly familiar with `SparkR`
documentation, I spent several minutes googling
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22278
I think there are many same instances. We should fix them everywhere
consistently. But I don't think it's worth enough fixing everywhere. It's
marked as deprecated and so it's deprecated, isn't
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22278
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22278
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22278
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
