Github user mmolimar commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22383
No problem. Done ;-)
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22383
**[Test build #4368 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/4368/testReport)**
for PR 22383 at commit
[`054c79a`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/0
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22383
**[Test build #4368 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/4368/testReport)**
for PR 22383 at commit
[`054c79a`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22383
Yeah, you'll have to add this to the 3.0 excludes section of
project/MimaExcludes:
`ProblemFilters.exclude[MissingClassProblem]("org.apache.spark.api.java.Optional")`
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22383
**[Test build #4376 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/4376/testReport)**
for PR 22383 at commit
[`6eaa3f1`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/6
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22383
**[Test build #4376 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/4376/testReport)**
for PR 22383 at commit
[`6eaa3f1`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22383
**[Test build #4379 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/4379/testReport)**
for PR 22383 at commit
[`f188243`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/f
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22383
**[Test build #4379 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/4379/testReport)**
for PR 22383 at commit
[`f188243`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22383
Oh, hm:
```
Serialization stack:
- object not serializable (class: java.util.Optional, value:
Optional[x])
- field (class: scala.Tuple2, name: _2, type: class java.lang.Ob
Github user mmolimar commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22383
I agree @srowen.
What do you think about reusing the current implementation we already have,
for example, in the guava lib instead of having that class in Spark?
---
-
Github user vanzin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22383
Spark's class only reason to exist is so we do *not* use the Guava class,
since everyone and their pet want to use a different version of Guava (and
Spark shades it for that reason).
---
-
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22383
Yeah, I think we just can't do this unfortunately. It was worth looking
into.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@
12 matches
Mail list logo
