Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8295
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enab
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8295#issuecomment-132448870
I've merged this.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this featur
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8295#issuecomment-132439685
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8295#issuecomment-132439686
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/41
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8295#issuecomment-132439632
[Test build #41192 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/41192/console)
for PR 8295 at commit
[`a3e4758`](https://github.
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8295#issuecomment-132412896
[Test build #41192 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/41192/consoleFull)
for PR 8295 at commit
[`a3e4758`](https://gith
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8295#issuecomment-132412156
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8295#issuecomment-132412165
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8295#discussion_r37372885
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/DataFrameComplexTypeSuite.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,46 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Found
GitHub user rxin opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8295
[SPARK-10093][SPARK-10096][SQL] Avoid transformation on executors & fix
UDFS on complex types
This is kind of a weird case, but given a sufficiently complex query plan
(in this case a TungstenProject
10 matches
Mail list logo
