Github user mccheah commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8887#issuecomment-143843978
The concept looks sound to me, however I'm actually less familiar with the
logic of where tasks get allocated. Someone else should also review!
---
If your project is s
Github user mccheah commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8887#discussion_r40588094
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/TaskSchedulerImpl.scala ---
@@ -362,8 +395,8 @@ private[spark] class TaskSchedulerImpl(
}
Github user andrewor14 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8887#issuecomment-143832319
can you add `[YARN]` to the title?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project doe
Github user vanzin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8887#issuecomment-143751726
/cc @squito also
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this featur
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8887#issuecomment-142769028
[Test build #42927 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/42927/console)
for PR 8887 at commit
[`5b90150`](https://github.
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8887#issuecomment-142769080
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/42
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8887#issuecomment-142769079
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8887#issuecomment-142763962
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8887#issuecomment-142763964
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/42
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8887#issuecomment-142763862
[Test build #42923 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/42923/console)
for PR 8887 at commit
[`5b90150`](https://github.
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8887#issuecomment-142743669
[Test build #42927 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/42927/consoleFull)
for PR 8887 at commit
[`5b90150`](https://gith
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8887#issuecomment-142741001
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8887#issuecomment-142740970
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user vanzin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8887#issuecomment-142740144
hmm. retest this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have thi
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8887#issuecomment-142737548
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/42
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8887#issuecomment-142737544
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8887#issuecomment-142735445
[Test build #42923 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/42923/consoleFull)
for PR 8887 at commit
[`5b90150`](https://gith
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8887#issuecomment-142734894
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8887#issuecomment-142734913
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user vanzin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8887#issuecomment-142733640
cc'ing a few people: @mccheah (who wrote the original preemption code),
@JoshRosen @andrewor14 (not sure who between you guys is reviewing this area
these days).
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8887#issuecomment-142732529
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8887#issuecomment-142732555
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
GitHub user vanzin opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8887
[SPARK-10622] [core] Differentiate dead from "mostly dead" executors.
In YARN mode, when preemption is enabled, we may leave executors in a
zombie state while we wait to retrieve the reason for wh
23 matches
Mail list logo