Github user vanzin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9026#issuecomment-148782895
ah, btw, can you fix the pr description to reflect the actual change?
thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appea
Github user vanzin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9026#issuecomment-148775462
Much better. :-) LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this f
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9026#issuecomment-148594541
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/43
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9026#issuecomment-148594538
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9026#issuecomment-148594483
[Test build #43830 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/43830/console)
for PR 9026 at commit
[`58dcf4d`](https://github.
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9026#issuecomment-148591242
[Test build #43830 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/43830/consoleFull)
for PR 9026 at commit
[`58dcf4d`](https://gith
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9026#issuecomment-148589643
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9026#issuecomment-148589568
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user SaintBacchus commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9026#discussion_r42205797
--- Diff: yarn/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/yarn/Client.scala ---
@@ -1272,11 +1272,24 @@ object Client extends Logging {
val mirror
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9026#discussion_r42183714
--- Diff: yarn/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/yarn/Client.scala ---
@@ -1272,11 +1272,24 @@ object Client extends Logging {
val mirror = univ
Github user srowen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9026#issuecomment-147664500
OK I confess I don't know this aspect well but I think you explained how
this is different from just accidentally making two HiveContexts here. To my
knowledge it sounds
Github user SaintBacchus commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9026#issuecomment-147660393
Actually there are two metastores. In hive-1.2.1 when we use
`metastoe.Hive`, it will create the metastore in static code block. As spark
have two class loader(main
Github user srowen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9026#issuecomment-147644840
Makes sense. Is it a problem that we actually have two metastores? Maybe
not. That's my only question, looking at this from the outside.
---
If your project is set up fo
Github user SaintBacchus commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9026#issuecomment-147614244
@srowen In this issue there is only one `HiveContext`, but there will have
two `metastoe.Hive` instance in two different class loaderes. And in the
implement of `m
Github user srowen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9026#issuecomment-147607515
This looks reasonable but as in SPARK-9776 should there ever be two
HiveContexts open, or is this triggered without that? is it a problem that
there are two database inst
Github user KaiXinXiaoLei commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9026#issuecomment-147030150
LGTM.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
en
Github user SaintBacchus commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9026#issuecomment-147023274
/cc @marmbrus @liancheng
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9026#issuecomment-146460548
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/43
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9026#issuecomment-146460547
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9026#issuecomment-146460424
[Test build #43390 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/43390/console)
for PR 9026 at commit
[`0fab8c7`](https://github.
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9026#issuecomment-146450878
[Test build #43390 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/43390/consoleFull)
for PR 9026 at commit
[`0fab8c7`](https://gith
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9026#issuecomment-146449971
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9026#issuecomment-146449937
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
GitHub user SaintBacchus opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9026
[SPARK-11000][YARN]Bug fix: Derby have booted the database twice in yarn
security mode.
[obtainTokenForHiveMetastore](https://github.com/apache/spark/blob/master/yarn/src/main/scala/org/apache
24 matches
Mail list logo
