Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9571#issuecomment-168317081
**[Test build #48567 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48567/consoleFull)**
for PR 9571 at commit
[`06e5289`](https://gith
Github user steveloughran commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9571#issuecomment-163358148
latest branch cut out health checks. They'd be nice, but as they are useful
across all of spark, it's probably best to wait for something central to go in
and pick
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9571#issuecomment-163357569
**[Test build #47440 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/47440/consoleFull)**
for PR 9571 at commit
[`2e04803`](https://gith
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9571#issuecomment-160007597
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9571#issuecomment-160007599
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/4
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9571#issuecomment-160007559
**[Test build #46781 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/46781/consoleFull)**
for PR 9571 at commit
[`1dcbb5f`](https://git
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9571#issuecomment-160005832
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9571#issuecomment-160005835
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/4
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9571#issuecomment-160005802
**[Test build #46780 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/46780/consoleFull)**
for PR 9571 at commit
[`1dcbb5f`](https://git
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9571#issuecomment-160005780
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9571#issuecomment-160005781
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/4
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9571#issuecomment-160005758
**[Test build #46782 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/46782/consoleFull)**
for PR 9571 at commit
[`25e77bd`](https://git
Github user steveloughran commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9571#issuecomment-16264
(Note that the POMs changed to pull in some more of the codahale servlets,
though only the health checks & thread dump are being registered. Hooking up
those servl
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9571#issuecomment-159998497
**[Test build #46782 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/46782/consoleFull)**
for PR 9571 at commit
[`25e77bd`](https://gith
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9571#issuecomment-159997461
**[Test build #46781 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/46781/consoleFull)**
for PR 9571 at commit
[`1dcbb5f`](https://gith
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9571#issuecomment-159997153
**[Test build #46780 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/46780/consoleFull)**
for PR 9571 at commit
[`1dcbb5f`](https://gith
Github user steveloughran commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9571#issuecomment-159996648
jenkins, test this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user steveloughran commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9571#issuecomment-159996634
Added reworked design
* all metrics go through the `MetricsSystem`; the providers return an
optional `Source` from the `start()` call.
* `FsHistoryProv
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9571#issuecomment-159996343
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/4
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9571#issuecomment-159996339
**[Test build #46779 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/46779/consoleFull)**
for PR 9571 at commit
[`f6bf558`](https://git
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9571#issuecomment-159996342
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9571#issuecomment-159996173
**[Test build #46779 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/46779/consoleFull)**
for PR 9571 at commit
[`f6bf558`](https://gith
Github user steveloughran commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9571#discussion_r45874984
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/history/FsHistoryProvider.scala ---
@@ -678,6 +709,69 @@ private[history] class FsHistoryProvider(
Github user steveloughran commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9571#discussion_r45874777
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/history/HistoryServer.scala ---
@@ -121,20 +132,36 @@ class HistoryServer(
/**
* In
Github user steveloughran commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9571#issuecomment-155900033
...I thought it did. If I'm wrong, then yes, all you need is a context.
Once that's in there, the HistorySource should be what's needed
---
If your project is set
Github user CharlesYeh commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9571#issuecomment-155863566
I'm assuming you didn't make a HistorySource in HistoryServer (what
MasterSource in Master does) because it requires the MetricsSystem.
Where does MetricsSyst
Github user CharlesYeh commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9571#issuecomment-155695451
Thanks! I'll look into this
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9571#issuecomment-155169298
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9571#issuecomment-155165489
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9571#issuecomment-155165525
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9571#issuecomment-155153349
**[Test build #45386 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/45386/consoleFull)**
for PR 9571 at commit
[`cb7cddb`](https://git
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9571#issuecomment-155153352
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9571#issuecomment-155150767
**[Test build #45386 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/45386/consoleFull)**
for PR 9571 at commit
[`cb7cddb`](https://gith
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9571#issuecomment-155148739
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9571#issuecomment-155148705
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
GitHub user steveloughran opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9571
[SPARK-11373] [CORE] WiP Add metrics to the History Server and providers
This adds metrics to the history server, with the `FsHistoryProvider`
metering its load, performance and reliabili
36 matches
Mail list logo
