Github user davies commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10477#issuecomment-167497951
LGTM, merging into master and 1.6 (for doc). I think it's fine to not fix
1.5 branch, until some one hit it, because we may not have a new release for
1.5 branch.
---
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10477
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user gatorsmile commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10477#issuecomment-167506376
Thank you!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user gatorsmile commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10477#issuecomment-167352929
@davies @JoshRosen Could you check if this PR is appropriate? Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear
GitHub user gatorsmile opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10477
[SPARK-12520] [PySpark] Correct Descriptions and Add Use Cases in Equi-Join
After reading the JIRA https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-12520, I
double checked the code.
For
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10477#issuecomment-167260644
**[Test build #48327 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48327/consoleFull)**
for PR 10477 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10477#issuecomment-167261159
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10477#issuecomment-167261160
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10477#issuecomment-167261145
**[Test build #48327 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48327/consoleFull)**
for PR 10477 at commit
