Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/156
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabl
Github user pwendell commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/156#issuecomment-39687170
Merged, thanks.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/156#issuecomment-39657291
Merged build finished. All automated tests passed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/156#issuecomment-39657292
All automated tests passed.
Refer to this link for build results:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/13815/
---
If your project
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/156#issuecomment-39656279
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not ha
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/156#issuecomment-39656284
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user mateiz commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/156#issuecomment-39656235
Jenkins, test this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/156#issuecomment-39652010
Refer to this link for build results:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/13801/
---
If your project is set up for it, you can r
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/156#issuecomment-39652009
Merged build finished.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user mateiz commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/156#issuecomment-39649892
Awesome, thanks! I'll merge it once it gets past Jenkins.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/156#issuecomment-39649894
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not ha
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/156#issuecomment-39649898
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user mateiz commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/156#issuecomment-39649888
Jenkins, test this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user pwendell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/156#discussion_r11322315
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/rdd/RDD.scala ---
@@ -664,6 +664,18 @@ abstract class RDD[T: ClassTag](
}
/**
+ * Retu
Github user epahomov commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/156#issuecomment-39630218
Checked laziness. Good to go.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not hav
Github user epahomov commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/156#issuecomment-39630047
Sure, I like this approach, I will change it on Sunday.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. I
Github user mateiz commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/156#issuecomment-39601555
@epahomov Do you mind changing the code to use Iterators and flatMap as
suggested too? It would be simpler than what's there now.
---
If your project is set up for it, you
Github user epahomov commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/156#issuecomment-39538362
Doc's changed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/156#issuecomment-39499615
Merged build finished.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/156#issuecomment-39499617
Refer to this link for build results:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/13731/
---
If your project is set up for it, you can r
Github user mateiz commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/156#discussion_r11266579
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/rdd/RDD.scala ---
@@ -664,6 +664,24 @@ abstract class RDD[T: ClassTag](
}
/**
+ * Return
Github user mateiz commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/156#issuecomment-39490196
Made some more comments to simplify this now that we return an Iterator.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on Git
Github user mateiz commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/156#discussion_r11266448
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/rdd/RDD.scala ---
@@ -664,6 +664,24 @@ abstract class RDD[T: ClassTag](
}
/**
+ * Return
Github user mateiz commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/156#discussion_r11266352
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/rdd/RDD.scala ---
@@ -664,6 +664,24 @@ abstract class RDD[T: ClassTag](
}
/**
+ * Return
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/156#issuecomment-39489554
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not ha
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/156#issuecomment-39489572
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user mateiz commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/156#discussion_r11266266
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/rdd/RDD.scala ---
@@ -664,6 +664,24 @@ abstract class RDD[T: ClassTag](
}
/**
+ * Return
Github user mateiz commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/156#discussion_r11266262
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/api/java/JavaRDDLike.scala
---
@@ -282,6 +283,17 @@ trait JavaRDDLike[T, This <: JavaRDDLike[T, This]]
extends S
Github user mateiz commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/156#issuecomment-39489375
Jenkins, test this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/156#issuecomment-38881877
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your proj
Github user epahomov commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/156#issuecomment-38361789
Mark, Ok. Let this review be about simple changes for some user cases and
next one I try to cover more.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this emai
Github user markhamstra commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/156#issuecomment-38358029
@epahomov This PR may do everything that you want in terms of a streaming
iterator, but I can tell you with certainty that only being able to fetch a
single partition
Github user mridulm commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/156#issuecomment-38353582
Some time in future (not in this PR), we would want to add support for
disk-backed support for this feature : in case a partition is too large to fit
into memory. There is
Github user markhamstra commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/156#issuecomment-38339261
Sure, these locally iterable results are useful even without async and the
ability to cancel part way through the iteration; but that functionality is
also very useful
Github user mateiz commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/156#issuecomment-38338520
@markhamstra I'd be okay if this doesn't support an async version right now
since it's a tricky one to make async. It still seems useful as is.
---
If your project is set
Github user mateiz commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/156#discussion_r10859655
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/rdd/RDD.scala ---
@@ -664,6 +664,24 @@ abstract class RDD[T: ClassTag](
}
/**
+ * Return
Github user mateiz commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/156#discussion_r10859640
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/rdd/RDD.scala ---
@@ -664,6 +664,24 @@ abstract class RDD[T: ClassTag](
}
/**
+ * Return
Github user mateiz commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/156#discussion_r10859630
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/rdd/RDD.scala ---
@@ -664,6 +664,24 @@ abstract class RDD[T: ClassTag](
}
/**
+ * Return
Github user epahomov commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/156#issuecomment-38143969
Hi, what do you think about new changes?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project d
Github user epahomov commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/156#issuecomment-37912860
Code added. Tests passed. Let's do it again)
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your proje
Github user markhamstra commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/156#issuecomment-37828372
Looks like this effort should be coordinated with this PR that should be
brought over from incubator-spark:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-spark/pull/421
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/156#issuecomment-37790992
One or more automated tests failed
Refer to this link for build results:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/13208/
---
If your p
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/156#issuecomment-37790991
Merged build finished.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/156#issuecomment-37790929
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have t
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/156#issuecomment-37790928
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not hav
Github user mateiz commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/156#issuecomment-37789500
Hey Egor, this looks good, but a few comments:
* We should add a Java API method for it too, in JavaRDDLike.
Unfortunately, `toStream` will not be a good name there beca
Github user mateiz commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/156#discussion_r10647019
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/rdd/RDD.scala ---
@@ -664,6 +664,22 @@ abstract class RDD[T: ClassTag](
}
/**
+ * Return
Github user mateiz commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/156#discussion_r10647011
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/rdd/RDD.scala ---
@@ -664,6 +664,22 @@ abstract class RDD[T: ClassTag](
}
/**
+ * Return
Github user mateiz commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/156#issuecomment-37789306
Jenkins, test this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user mateiz commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/156#discussion_r10647006
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/rdd/RDD.scala ---
@@ -664,6 +664,22 @@ abstract class RDD[T: ClassTag](
}
/**
+ * Return
50 matches
Mail list logo