Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10692#issuecomment-170723792
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10692#issuecomment-170723789
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10692#issuecomment-170722730
**[Test build #49170 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/49170/consoleFull)**
for PR 10692 at commit
[`a3e3e17`](https://g
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10692#issuecomment-170700792
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10692#issuecomment-170700788
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10692#issuecomment-170700549
**[Test build #49164 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/49164/consoleFull)**
for PR 10692 at commit
[`a3e3e17`](https://g
Github user zsxwing commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10692#issuecomment-170696776
> PY4J zip packaging and source diffs look good to me, so I think this is
good-to-go pending tests.
This is not ready for merging. I plan to revert our workarou
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10692#issuecomment-170696906
**[Test build #49170 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/49170/consoleFull)**
for PR 10692 at commit
[`a3e3e17`](https://gi
Github user JoshRosen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10692#issuecomment-170694122
PY4J zip packaging and source diffs look good to me, so I think this is
good-to-go pending tests.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email a
Github user JoshRosen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10692#issuecomment-170691831
Jenkins, retest this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user zsxwing commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10692#issuecomment-170685818
By the way, I packed py4j-0.9.1-src.zip by myself since I could not find it
anywhere.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
r
Github user JoshRosen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10692#issuecomment-170678358
I've opened https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10704 to fix this
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on Git
Github user JoshRosen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10692#issuecomment-170674256
Actually, I think I've spotted the problem. Working on a small fix now.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear o
Github user JoshRosen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10692#issuecomment-170673876
@zsxwing, that file is generated as part of the dummy publishing step which
is used to produce POMs for use by the `dev/test-dependencies` checks. Ping me
if it happe
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10692#issuecomment-170671275
**[Test build #49164 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/49164/consoleFull)**
for PR 10692 at commit
[`a3e3e17`](https://gi
Github user zsxwing commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10692#issuecomment-170669178
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this fe
Github user zsxwing commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10692#issuecomment-170669146
```
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/lib64/python2.6/runpy.py", line 122, in _run_module_as_main
"__main__", fname, loader, pkg_name)
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10692#issuecomment-170668217
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10692#issuecomment-170668214
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10692#issuecomment-170667956
**[Test build #49157 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/49157/consoleFull)**
for PR 10692 at commit
[`a3e3e17`](https://g
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10692#issuecomment-170635222
**[Test build #49157 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/49157/consoleFull)**
for PR 10692 at commit
[`a3e3e17`](https://gi
Github user zsxwing commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10692#issuecomment-170630065
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this fe
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10692#issuecomment-170545480
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10692#issuecomment-170545395
**[Test build #49116 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/49116/consoleFull)**
for PR 10692 at commit
[`a3e3e17`](https://g
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10692#issuecomment-170545478
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10692#issuecomment-170502300
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10692#issuecomment-170502241
**[Test build #49095 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/49095/consoleFull)**
for PR 10692 at commit
[`a3e3e17`](https://g
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10692#issuecomment-170502298
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10692#issuecomment-170476157
**[Test build #49116 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/49116/consoleFull)**
for PR 10692 at commit
[`a3e3e17`](https://gi
Github user JoshRosen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10692#issuecomment-170469406
Jenkins, retest this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10692#issuecomment-170442518
**[Test build #49095 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/49095/consoleFull)**
for PR 10692 at commit
[`a3e3e17`](https://gi
GitHub user zsxwing opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10692
[SPARK-12652][PySpark][WIP]Upgrade Py4J to 0.9.1
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/zsxwing/spark py4j-0.9.1
Alternatively you ca
32 matches
Mail list logo